From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-06.mail-europe.com (mail-06.mail-europe.com [85.9.210.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B066576EA8; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 16:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.9.210.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788883469; cv=none; b=Rco4XSTTPzabrkCY2QOECXRdHp+d0Ep4JxSH0Hh0LCzDxdCpTSsB1jsO/ZhmdJDT/mdQ5vkiMPL4qgtZELwC33u09Lno8WM5LYQoCHHnbwF5DPy+Q6Rr+5RRBNEUkuYs+1+jvW68rQr9G1uA3E5DCfrjfhX4BxSYjlAf/LExn4U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788883469; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZklINIGdqQH8GrDGYUn9b0Zuk3laMH2xgV5+Sg6qzoY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y2/YbmWsd6lhqHXh3HnzfgmrtDogVemHXHBzuiLwtgnVT3DyK5laNMcGJKOnwOrEkxt4Lq1LnYg6KkAQftDbhD4PvvhJqyycOGiDuKVYzfP96rvnwqqfAdzVPQuujmS9Z70b7Wjjb6tDAuyJRI9bKzCax4CdjCiqqHRR60jKC6U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dawidwrobel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dawidwrobel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dawidwrobel.com header.i=@dawidwrobel.com header.b=gKmhUhza; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.9.210.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dawidwrobel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dawidwrobel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dawidwrobel.com header.i=@dawidwrobel.com header.b="gKmhUhza" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dawidwrobel.com; s=protonmail2; t=1788883448; x=1789142648; bh=ZklINIGdqQH8GrDGYUn9b0Zuk3laMH2xgV5+Sg6qzoY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=gKmhUhzauMbA7JQgu27gRNlnQOeTP3+hC4OdjaAmWHh9e4RgKANgXUnjIxPEmVuFJ 7ij4iEldTMfDKckH4RgVoCWXGcr3m6h5uIcpPmfhuFYlJJgGSbEI/nifImuAwRDqpg Tm9vOjBH3ZP8HwrTzelhE8edPefV5NByF08QDp3DhX0xgauuzsMO3/GB4tk/06dizL XjBjafmsrvQe+t6zNVHJFclOM0rmiHSU9Y4oXRY/nk1shA0nukWLjydkEicMyUH6z7 56CAooONG53zoV2VHiMqxBYGEqpDIRfl6PZ6arfpibEgLOvkIzAy8q0lBndFrRxlxn At/tmTJV5rO0Q== Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:04:03 +0000 To: Konrad Dybcio , Jianhua Lu , Neil Armstrong , Jessica Zhang , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio From: Dawid Wrobel Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: add device tree for the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro 5G Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1cdfb3e1-8a89-4b52-a5db-0359a9f68878@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260730-sm8250-xiaomi-enuma-v1-0-ed6d8fb99668@dawidwrobel.com> <20260730-sm8250-xiaomi-enuma-v1-4-ed6d8fb99668@dawidwrobel.com> <1cdfb3e1-8a89-4b52-a5db-0359a9f68878@oss.qualcomm.com> Feedback-ID: 173987960:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: d5af8631e3ab773a6de51e94154d2b5224022f93 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18.08.2026 12:48, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> + * Copyright (c) 2025 Dawid Wr=C3=B3bel >=20 > Happy new year! Hah, indeed! >> +=09status =3D "okay"; >=20 > ultra nit: \n before status is preferred Thank you for the review. Both fixed in v3, which I just sent out: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260908-sm8250-xiaomi-enuma-v3-0-0198c3bf954a@da= widwrobel.com Note that v2 had been on the list for two weeks when you reviewed this one, so it may have slipped past you. It folds the WiFi-label patch into this one per Krzysztof's feedback. I *did* carry your Reviewed-by onto the v3 patch, though =E2=80=94 let me know if you'd rather take another loo= k on that fold. --=20 With Kind Regards, Dawid Wrobel