From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
soc@kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] arm64: dts: Update cache properties for socionext
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:53:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc5ba655-e739-bb24-263c-5f362b0d0f35@socionext.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ccb48488-7fa2-4784-8c5c-7d6084d16016@linaro.org>
Hi Krzysztof, Rob,
On 2023/10/21 6:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2023 21:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
>>
>> The DeviceTree Specification v0.3 specifies that the cache node
>> 'compatible' and 'cache-level' properties are 'required'. Cf.
>> s3.8 Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes
>> The 'cache-unified' property should be present if one of the
>> properties for unified cache is present ('cache-size', ...).
>>
>> Update the Device Trees accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107155825.1644604-21-pierre.gondois@arm.com
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> I noticed this one fell thru the cracks from the rest of the series.
>>
>> Arnd, Can you take this directly.
>
> A bit after Pierre - in April 2023 - I sent similar which was said to be
> "applied":
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f9a2c0d7-a78d-9368-f9bb-e8aba11e7d81@socionext.com/
>
> Maybe the Socionext status in MAINTAINERS should be odd fixes?
Sorry my mistake.
I thought Pierre's patch had been already applied, however,
I set Krzysztof's patch to "applied" but it was missing from the post to soc.
Since Krzysztof's patch includes the same "cache-level" lines as Pierre's,
the lines needs to be removed.
I'll post the update series including both to soc.
Thank you,
---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 19:50 [RESEND PATCH v2] arm64: dts: Update cache properties for socionext Rob Herring
2023-10-20 21:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-23 1:53 ` Kunihiko Hayashi [this message]
2023-10-20 21:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc5ba655-e739-bb24-263c-5f362b0d0f35@socionext.com \
--to=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox