[PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Andreas Kemnade]

Add software-compatible variant of the BD71828.

Changes in v2:
allow compatible = "rohm,bd71879", "rohm,bd71828"

Andreas Kemnade (2):
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879
  mfd: rohm-bd71828: Add software-compatible variant BD71879

 .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c                                 | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Andreas Kemnade]

As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
index 0b62f854bf6b..07f99738fcf6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
@@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ description: |
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    const: rohm,bd71828
+    oneOf:
+      - const: rohm,bd71828
+
+      - items:
+          - const: rohm,bd71879
+          - const: rohm,bd71828
 
   reg:
     description:
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: rohm-bd71828: Add software-compatible variant BD71879

[Andreas Kemnade]

Add the BD71879 PMIC which is software-compatible to the BD71828, so reuse
the same device_type enum.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
index 4a1fa8a0d76a..f0b444690d4d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
@@ -585,6 +585,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id bd71828_of_match[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "rohm,bd71828",
 		.data = (void *)ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "rohm,bd71879",
+		/* equivalent from a software point of view */
+		.data = (void *)ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828,
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "rohm,bd71815",
 		.data = (void *)ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815,
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/04/2024 21:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: rohm-bd71828: Add software-compatible variant BD71879

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/04/2024 21:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Add the BD71879 PMIC which is software-compatible to the BD71828, so reuse
> the same device_type enum.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> ---

Now you can drop this patch. The benefit of the compatibility is to drop
this code.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Matti Vaittinen]

On 4/4/24 22:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> index 0b62f854bf6b..07f99738fcf6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> @@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ description: |
>   
>   properties:
>     compatible:
> -    const: rohm,bd71828
> +    oneOf:
> +      - const: rohm,bd71828
> +
> +      - items:
> +          - const: rohm,bd71879
> +          - const: rohm,bd71828
>   
>     reg:
>       description:

Am I correct, this reads as:

Either
	compatible = rohm,bd71828
or
	compatible = rohm,bd71879, rohm,bd71828

but not compatible = rohm,bd71879?

If so, this looks ok to me. :)
	

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:57:08AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 4/4/24 22:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > index 0b62f854bf6b..07f99738fcf6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > @@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ description: |
> >   properties:
> >     compatible:
> > -    const: rohm,bd71828
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - const: rohm,bd71828
> > +
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: rohm,bd71879
> > +          - const: rohm,bd71828
> >     reg:
> >       description:
> 
> Am I correct, this reads as:
> 
> Either
> 	compatible = rohm,bd71828
> or
> 	compatible = rohm,bd71879, rohm,bd71828
> 
> but not compatible = rohm,bd71879?

Correct.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Matti Vaittinen]

On 4/10/24 13:03, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:57:08AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> On 4/4/24 22:54, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
>>> As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
>>> Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml         | 7 ++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
>>> index 0b62f854bf6b..07f99738fcf6 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ description: |
>>>    properties:
>>>      compatible:
>>> -    const: rohm,bd71828
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - const: rohm,bd71828
>>> +
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - const: rohm,bd71879
>>> +          - const: rohm,bd71828
>>>      reg:
>>>        description:
>>
>> Am I correct, this reads as:
>>
>> Either
>> 	compatible = rohm,bd71828
>> or
>> 	compatible = rohm,bd71879, rohm,bd71828
>>
>> but not compatible = rohm,bd71879?
> 
> Correct.

Thanks Conor!

I guess that if we later find out that there is a 'gizmo' in BD71828 
which is not present on BD71879 - and if we write driver supporting 
this, then we need to have handling for both the BD71879 and BD71828 in 
this driver to ensure the fall-back wont happen. It's a bit ugly as I 
think the fall-back compatible should be used only in case where the 
"fall-back" HW can be guaranteed to have exactly same, or a subset of, 
features of the "full board".

Well, I've been told these are similar by HW colleagues. I have my 
doubts if 'similar' really is '_similar_', or if it's 'similar, except 
of course...' - but let's trust the HW guys on this. We have the above 
mentioned workaround if we should not have trusted...

Acked-By: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 21:54:22 +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879
      commit: 9814ee9b64c06aae57c8a8f003014b3d90e09a3d

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]