From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/of: Add devm_of_iomap()
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:18:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddc9a616517f8c4255efe2f57d13d3b3ba81ee89.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfV7actoXkMUbh9KwAXR1FKR_VZ5RAuaL-pKLSynFi-3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 02:16 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 19:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It feels like a wrong approach.
> > > > > Can OF graph help here? Would it be better approach?
> > > >
> > > > I don't quite understand what your objection is nor what "OF graph"
> > > > is...
> > >
> > > There is no objection per se, just a doubt that this is a right thing to do.
> > > I might be wrong, of course.
> > >
> > > OF graph nodes is a special API that allows you to access like you
> > > said "different node of device-tree".
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt
> >
> > So I had a look and this is just an example on how to use phandles to
> > link ports and endpoints... I fail to see how that relates to what this
> > patch does.
>
> Because your patch does nothing except another layring of the existing APIs.
I'm really having a hard time understanding what you are going on
about..
Yes, it's a helper that combines two existing API functions, the goal
being to generally replace the use of the existing of_iomap whenever
possible. It makes sense and makes callers simpler and less bug prone.
>
> > In the driver I'm doing for example, I do use a similar technique to
> > "point" to the other node. In this case, this is a coprocessor in the
> > SoC and I'm linking to the node that represent its interrupt controller
> > (and its not a full fledged OS running there so we don't have a full
> > interrupt tree for it).
>
> Hmm... So, you are trying to solve problem with other methods which
> might be not so suitable at all?
Again, I cannot understand what you are going on about, what is "not
suitable" to what purpose ?
It's fairly common for nodes to point to each other. We've been doing
that since the dawn of the device-tree.
In this case, we have a coprocessor bound to a device and pointing to
its interrupt controller, and we need to get to that and map it, I fail
to see what the issue is and in what way this is "not suitable".
But there are many other uses of things like of_iomap() which could
benefit from switching to devm_of_iomap() and thus getting the
automated cleanup on exit and appropriate request of the memory
resource.
(hint: I wrote of_iomap and a good bulk of what's in
drivers/of/address.c...
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-13 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-12 0:01 [PATCH] drivers/of: Add devm_of_iomap() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-12 8:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-12 10:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-12 16:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-12 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-12 23:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-13 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2018-06-13 8:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-12 17:42 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-12 22:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-13 15:00 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13 23:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-14 8:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-06-14 23:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-15 6:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-06-15 6:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-14 13:30 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddc9a616517f8c4255efe2f57d13d3b3ba81ee89.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).