Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss

[Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>]

On 4/24/25 13:17, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 24/04/2025 11:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/04/2025 11:34, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2025 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> +  vdd-csiphy-0p8-supply:
>>>> Same comment as other series on the lists - this is wrong name. There
>>>> are no pins named like this and all existing bindings use different name.
>>>
>>> The existing bindings are unfortunately not granular enough.
>>>
>>> I'll post s series to capture pin-names per the SoC pinout shortly.
>> How are the pins/supplies actually called?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> I don't think strictly algning to pin-names is what we want.
> 
> Here are the input pins
> 
> VDD_A_CSI_0_1_1P2
> VDD_A_CSI_2_4_1P2
> VDD_A_CSI_0_1_0P9
> VDD_A_CSI_2_4_0P9
> 
> I think the right way to represent this
> 
> yaml:
> csiphy0-1p2-supply
> csiphy1-1p2-supply
> csiphy2-1p2-supply
> csiphy3-1p2-supply
> 
> dts:
> 
> vdd-csiphy0-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l2c_0p8>;
> vdd-csiphy1-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l2c_0p8>;
> 
> etc
> 
> vdda-csiphy0-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l1c_1p2>;
> 
> because that captures the fact we could have separate lines for each
> phy, names it generically and then leaves it up to the dts
> implementation to represent what actually happened on the PCB.
> 
> That would also work for qcm2290 and sm8650.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250423221954.1926453-2-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org/
> 
> So for sm8650 instead of
> 
> +  vdda-csi01-0p9-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csi24-0p9-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csi35-0p9-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csi01-1p2-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csi24-1p2-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csi35-1p2-supply:
> 
> you would have
> 
> +  vdda-csiphy0-0p9-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csiphy1-0p9-supply:
> 
> +  vdda-csiphy0-1p2-supply:
> +
> +  vdda-csiphy1-1p2-supply:
>

This option will work for SM8650, if the list of the given 6 supplies,
where one supply property represens a pad to power up two CSIPHYs, is
extended to the list of 12 supplies, one for each individual CSIPHY.

Both options will be technically equivalent/correct, an alternative
one is just two times longer.

I would appreciate to get a maintainer's decision here.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir