From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82555C43219 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230107AbiKYOr0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:47:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45580 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230056AbiKYOrY (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:47:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1AE10DA for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id r12so7262059lfp.1 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=usClvSs3mC6FvIhfguF/sEt/gkxumcuZsEzXV26BLwCRWyr07wpUDcacmF61zVLKPR 4b46+DrsjeGTpJs4Rz6cKLkXOJNviO0ZeBoqcGZGt6PWmxFN+kR+a96LaG8VwLpSqDkx goU+yxqpDJ/wWC5qZvAINZkaHs5Yqu6Dyn/gkN36gYSpsynBgMP78DiVuICmU5IoYSDu ZSN5X5Za9PqaptEEca8OmXdQ9gvV5B+AF+roHy6kclTYwEc+dAsg6/RiBrprc8VtRRtb ue6EdI+9kSpsFmIkikRBiN+RbXp81fj4XYloUMa16gJjB+8ssQrKA0NK0EVWlEfJjx5e wKrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=a46ge4nqlNlHRO6lVHfoLEE4qsDrqJx4MUCO9rRb4TdPHetMn6AG534TgZ4XQ3Xyly gkBIK78ca/sxfhvZ1zZlx8BES6D1Tw8eyO5ZfeqroW6XCzMYyf30WeNC7vZI54sBlPhO 76VHXBx3JBf8kTT4iZsl9Q6HOYM5p3c6c0m6gVEQYUOJ/aQ2X90xvr9q2tsXk473KmwI A9MxiL7YlShvGjF1OqAxErhoQs9w9ovhSzwBJlRbbnwtiEHR9A/H55lphXH1XkWL6xIA 2HnLl/FdD/OYAUb7bYmJgbS2I6naPg5M+dddeAO+zlTBk41hJ1YPkXcwLj2Z2nBOqIig qxgg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmU6ZPIg3ayf8ggIKGjmx51C7vDEo7trxFvC2li7lDPHekkb4AD bQaPv09VjxXXA7e/BpveOvpQnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4JdsPg2OacWHAZHBS95kHhrvSJgsXU9oA5FBTdtRat1RDp/3S8jHWNMMuKkVsrI0TT4mXz8A== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4843:0:b0:4a2:1169:3934 with SMTP id 3-20020ac24843000000b004a211693934mr13530237lfy.279.1669387640881; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020a05651234ca00b00494942bec60sm557057lfr.17.2022.11.25.06.47.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos5433 To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Sriranjani P , Chanho Park References: <20221125112201.240178-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20221125112201.240178-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25/11/2022 15:22, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 05:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> Exynos5433 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles >> for them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> --- >> >> Cc: Sriranjani P >> Cc: Chanho Park >> Cc: Sam Protsenko >> --- > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Just curious: what is the rationale for adding those more specific > sysregs? AFAIR, e.g. in Exynos850, different SysReg instances have > pretty much the same register layout. > On Exynos5433 all these blocks have different registers. Are you saying that Exynos850 has four (or more) sysregs which are exactly the same? Same registers? Why would they duplicate it? Best regards, Krzysztof