From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
bp@alien8.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mchehab@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: Add OCRAM EDAC node
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:42:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e02b1065-c81a-80f3-1790-f8f7dbfe4831@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4763af33-0cae-bc82-8963-41554ee56ea5@kernel.org>
On 1/23/19 10:56 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/19 11:48 AM, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add the OCRAM ECC node following the Arria10 format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v2 No changes
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
>> index 8253a1a9e985..a625dc472b91 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
>> @@ -494,6 +494,13 @@
>> interrupts = <16 4>, <48 4>;
>> };
>>
>> + ocram-ecc@ff8cc000 {
>> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";
>
> Are you absolutely sure there are no differences in the Stratix10 versus
> A10? I wonder if it would be safer to have a platform specific binding
> for Stratix10 rather than re-using A10. It would prevent from having to
> change bindings later.
>
> Dinh
>
They are the same functionally. However, you bring up a good point.
There are differences related to the underlying architecture - 32bit vs
64bit.
I will respin this series (except for the first fixup patch) with new
bindings for S10.
Thanks,
Thor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-24 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-22 17:48 [PATCHv2 0/4] Stratix10 EDAC Improvements thor.thayer
2019-01-22 17:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] EDAC, altera: Fix S10 persistent register offset thor.thayer
2019-01-22 17:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] EDAC, altera: Less Intrusive Error Injection thor.thayer
2019-01-22 17:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] EDAC, altera: Add Stratix10 OCRAM ECC support thor.thayer
2019-01-22 17:48 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: Add OCRAM EDAC node thor.thayer
2019-01-23 16:56 ` Dinh Nguyen
2019-01-24 15:42 ` Thor Thayer [this message]
2019-01-23 12:22 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] Stratix10 EDAC Improvements Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e02b1065-c81a-80f3-1790-f8f7dbfe4831@linux.intel.com \
--to=thor.thayer@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).