From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] spmi: pmic-arb: Enforce the ownership check optionally Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1503070110-15018-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1503070110-15018-1-git-send-email-kgunda-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kiran Gunda , gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , David Collins , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/18/2017 08:28 AM, Kiran Gunda wrote: > The peripheral ownership check is not necessary on single master > platforms. Hence, enforce the peripheral ownership check optionally. > > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda > Tested-by: Shawn Guo > --- This sounds like a band-aid. Isn't the gpio driver going to keep probing all the pins that are not supposed to be accessed due to security constraints? What exactly is failing in the gpio case? Also, I thought we were getting rid of the ownership checks? Or at least, putting them behind some debug kernel feature check or something? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html