From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: rename AOSS QMP node to pmu
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:54:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0e6960d-0aac-ddd7-0a6c-2695f3bf3e61@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n50y4N76Y-EEQ1sjT3Q_HnOLfFTw=qmus1X0CbD9Nt0v8w@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/12/2022 20:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-12-12 05:33:02)
>> The Always On Subsystem (AOSS) QMP is not a power domain controller
>> since commit 135780456218 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Use QMP property
>> to control load state") and few others. In fact, it was never a power
>> domain controller but rather control of power state of remote
>> processors. This power state control is know handled differently, thus
>> the AOSS QMP nodes do not have power-domain-cells:
>>
>> sc7280-idp.dtb: power-controller@c300000: '#power-domain-cells' is a required property
>> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
>>
>> AOSS QMP is an interface to the actuall AOSS subsystem responsible for
>> some of power management functions, thus let's call the nodes as "pmu" -
>> Power Management Unit.
>
> Isn't 'pmu' a performance monitoring unit?
No. PMU is whatever you call it... ARM calls it Performance Monitoring
Unit, Samsung and Rockchip (and maybe others) call it Power Management
Unit. It's just an acronym.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 13:32 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: correct SPMI bus address cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 13:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-12 19:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-12-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 13:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-12 19:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-12-13 8:12 ` Johan Hovold
2022-12-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: rename AOSS QMP node to pmu Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 13:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-12 13:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 19:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-12-13 7:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-12-12 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: correct SPMI bus address cells Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-12 13:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-12 19:06 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e0e6960d-0aac-ddd7-0a6c-2695f3bf3e61@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).