From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIFZva8OhxI0=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/22] ARM: dts: imx6: Add touchscreens used on Toradex eval boards Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190730144649.19022-1-dev@pschenker.ch> <20190730144649.19022-13-dev@pschenker.ch> <60760aa2d4710252e13877c409d0c4d2267824a6.camel@toradex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <60760aa2d4710252e13877c409d0c4d2267824a6.camel@toradex.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Philippe Schenker , "festevam@gmail.com" Cc: "stefan@agner.ch" , Marcel Ziswiler , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , Max Krummenacher , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "linux-imx@nxp.com" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 31. 07. 19 8:43, Philippe Schenker wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 17:46 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:57 AM Philippe Schenker wrote: >> >>> + /* Atmel maxtouch controller */ >>> + atmel_mxt_ts: atmel_mxt_ts@4a { >> >> Generic node names, please: >> >> touchscreen@4a >> >>> + compatible = "atmel,maxtouch"; >>> + pinctrl-names = "default"; >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_pcap_1>; >>> + reg = <0x4a>; >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>; >>> + interrupts = <9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; /* SODIMM 28 */ >>> + reset-gpios = <&gpio2 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* SODIMM 30 */ >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * the PCAPs use SODIMM 28/30, also used for PWM, PWM, aka >>> pwm1, >>> + * pwm4. So if you enable one of the PCAP controllers disable the >>> pwms. >>> + */ >>> + pcap: pcap@10 { >> >> touchscreen@10 >> >>> + /* TouchRevolution Fusion 7 and 10 multi-touch controller */ >>> + compatible = "touchrevolution,fusion-f0710a"; >> >> I do not find this binding documented. > > Thanks for your feedback Fabio, and sorry such obvious stuff went through. I > will go through my whole patchset again more carefully lookup all the bindings. > Hi Philippe, also look at the I2C sub-nodes - they should be sorted by the bus address. In most of the patches it is not correct. Michal