Re: [PATCH 2/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Update defines for am6 for inline functions

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 07/04/2022 12:26, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [220407 08:50]:
>> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [220407 08:23]:
>>> On 07/04/2022 10:15, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [220407 08:01]:
>>>>> On 07/04/2022 09:10, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ int omap_dm_timers_active(void);
>>>>>>      * The below are inlined to optimize code size for system timers. Other code
>>>>>>      * should not need these at all.
>>>>>>      */
>>>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS)
>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS) || \
>>>>>> +	defined(CONFIG_ARCH_K3)
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not replace the above by CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER ?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm that's a good question for why it was not that way earlier.
>>>>
>>>> This series changes things for tristate "OMAP dual-mode timer driver" if
>>>> ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST though. So the inline stubs are still needed for
>>>> COMPILE_TEST it seems.
>>>
>>> But if ARCH_K3 or COMPILE_TEST is set, CONFIG_DM_TIMER is also set, no?
>>
>> Right but I suspect that COMPILE_TEST will produce a build error on other
>> architectures. I need to check that though, maybe that is no longer the
>> case.
> 
> We could use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER), but looks like we can now
> just move the __omap_dm_timer_* inline functions to timer-ti-dm.c instead.
> 
> I'll do that and repost after some testing.

Even better :)


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog