devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: add phylink managed WoL and convert stmmac
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:02:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e32011c7-1471-489f-8de2-1f7ac2c868b3@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPIwqo9mCEOb7ZQu@shell.armlinux.org.uk>



On 10/17/25 14:03, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series is implementing the thoughts of Andrew, Florian and myself
> to improve the quality of Wake-on-Lan (WoL) implementations.
> 
> This changes nothing for MAC drivers that do not wish to participate in
> this, but if they do, then they gain the benefit of phylink configuring
> WoL at the point closest to the media as possible.
> 
> We first need to solve the problem that the multitude of PHY drivers
> report their device supports WoL, but are not capable of waking the
> system. Correcting this is fundamental to choosing where WoL should be
> enabled - a mis-reported WoL support can render WoL completely
> ineffective.
> 
> The only PHY drivers which uses the driver model's wakeup support is
> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c, and until recently, realtek. This means
> we have the opportunity for PHY drivers to be _correctly_ converted
> to use this method of signalling wake-up capability only when they can
> actually wake the system, and thus providing a way for phylink to
> know whether to use PHY-based WoL at all.
> 
> However, a PHY driver not implementing that logic doesn't become a
> blocker to MACs wanting to convert. In full, the logic is:
> 
> - phylink supports a flag, wol_phy_legacy, which forces phylink to use
>    the PHY-based WoL even if the MDIO device is not marked as wake-up
>    capable.
> 
> - when wol_phy_legacy is not set, we check whether the PHY MDIO device
>    is wake-up capable. If it is, we offer the WoL request to the PHY.
> 
> - if neither wol_phy_legacy is set, or the PHY is not wake-up capable,
>    we do not offer the WoL request to the PHY.
> 
> In both cases, after setting any PHY based WoL, we remove the options
> that the PHY now reports are enabled from the options mask, and offer
> these (if any) to the MAC. The mac will get a "mac_set_wol()" method
> call when any settings change.
> 
> Phylink mainatains the WoL state for the MAC, so there's no need for
> a "mac_get_wol()" method. There may be the need to set the initial
> state but this is not supported at present.
> 
> I've also added support for doing the PHY speed-up/speed-down at
> suspend/resume time depending on the WoL state, which takes another
> issue from the MAC authors.
> 
> Lastly, with phylink now having the full picture for WoL, the
> "mac_wol" argument for phylink_suspend() becomes redundant, and for
> MAC drivers that implement mac_set_wol(), the value passed becomes
> irrelevant.
> 

Hello Russell,

Currently, I don't have the bandwidth to work on that subject.
It should be better in November.

I manipulated a bit this patchset when it was in the RFC state and I
remember having issues when suspending the platform with the PHY in
interrupt mode.
There was a PHY state change that generated an interrupt while the
suspend sequence was started leading to an immediate wakeup. This state
change occurs before the PHY driver ops are called. Therefore, I had
no chance of masking the non-WOL interrupts. I'm sorry for being
quite vague but I don't have the setup anymore.

Gatien

> Changes since RFC:
> - patch 3: fix location of phylink_xxx_supports_wol() helpers
> - patch 3: handle sopass for WAKE_MAGICSECURE only when the MAC is
>    handling magic secure.
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h       | 11 +--
>   .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c   | 31 +-------
>   drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c  | 45 +++++++----
>   .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c  |  4 +-
>   drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c                       | 14 +++-
>   drivers/net/phy/phylink.c                          | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>   include/linux/phy.h                                | 21 +++++
>   include/linux/phylink.h                            | 28 +++++++
>   8 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-21  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-17 12:03 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: add phylink managed WoL and convert stmmac Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-21  8:02 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER [this message]
2025-10-22  6:18 ` Russell King (Oracle)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e32011c7-1471-489f-8de2-1f7ac2c868b3@foss.st.com \
    --to=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=christophe.roullier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).