From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D36D1C7B96; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.142 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723022177; cv=none; b=pyMMLAejLw1K0nsyIJYesT+gRGl41aTWhwehqA6dfvWnezsg1dkkVZVsv7inbun4IgrzTUs/28mndEumdhuNMYEzREDFm49hhtS01a2WUze04cMqlE94EEK+Kfg6pB1iOqP0pSOdRlYXDhUu53S5iyVKlYyBDJrbjrfahUXI3X8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723022177; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZuTe47JVQMcJhss8fOCfJWiCiFKhu87pLv9XUMXp4j0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kgQNCNVxvp1tgZGx5xp0Jrw/cTgRpSCRl+RbGeAhMmRKPwOsx2Xx5g3PROMiwPruw3vxYTDxuLtjbMm510kQoLk+ExOEnt7yqhlSBVVbthVBHaPlE0mWaM2ETkFu9HpldRwgaozx74DBa4pjORoy1pB4OBM3OP3sd/Ykr64fvCI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=vixwKB0i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.142 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="vixwKB0i" Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4779G9uS065355; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:16:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1723022169; bh=8C8KMPHoShUAQQZeU9BlrjrX9QLKqFkwz0Ih4eBn9Do=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=vixwKB0i3LhzNKl7Gjvg5MrNCqFS9rDs/69pwd9C6z8FhJVRhHnz6fafvQF+ZZUN0 MLybzU9V46nLcmWElkyEPb83SGimUlw/O0hhsptKm9hBqRCgvscF/NPEjx5KA5mhf1 lobvPCawTZuhQrY00F1MJPZev6yrHo8r0on2qpdU= Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (dlee103.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.33]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 4779G9Io000735 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:16:09 -0500 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:16:08 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:16:08 -0500 Received: from [172.24.30.93] (lt5cd2489kgj.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.30.93]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4779G4j3131041; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:16:04 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:46:03 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e*: Add bootph-* properties To: Manorit Chawdhry CC: Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , , Neha Malcom Francis , Aniket Limaye , Beleswar Padhi , Siddharth Vadapalli References: <20240730-b4-upstream-bootph-all-v3-0-9bc2eccb6952@ti.com> <20240730-b4-upstream-bootph-all-v3-4-9bc2eccb6952@ti.com> <20240807083524.4ybzvvwch7e5jwck@uda0497581> Content-Language: en-US From: "Kumar, Udit" In-Reply-To: <20240807083524.4ybzvvwch7e5jwck@uda0497581> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Hi Manorit On 8/7/2024 2:05 PM, Manorit Chawdhry wrote: > Hi Udit, > > On 13:07-20240807, Kumar, Udit wrote: >>> }; >>> vdd_mmc1_en_pins_default: vdd-mmc1-en-default-pins { >>> @@ -622,6 +627,7 @@ J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0xf4, PIN_OUTPUT, 2)/* (D25) MCU_I3C0_SDA.MCU_UART0_RTSn */ >>> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0xe4, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (H28) WKUP_GPIO0_13.MCU_UART0_RXD */ >>> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0xe0, PIN_OUTPUT, 0)/* (G29) WKUP_GPIO0_12.MCU_UART0_TXD */ >>> >; >>> + bootph-pre-ram; >> >> Please make consistency between pin mux and node. >> >> Here I see pin mux is bootph-pre-ram and mcu_uart is bootph-all > Do we want it to be bootph-pre-ram or bootph-all? My suggestion will be bootph-all > > Regards, > Manorit