From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@gmail.com>,
Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mutanen,
Mikko" <Mikko.Mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Haikola, Heikki" <Heikki.Haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] iio: accel: Support Kionix/ROHM KX022A accelerometer
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:23:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3abc0a9-ad5b-f6ef-8cba-0b4c6c8325c0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzRU9aRNReonSqbg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On 9/28/22 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 02:14:14PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> On 9/22/22 20:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:45:35 +0300
>
> ...
>
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "no regmap\n");
>>>
>>> Use dev_err_probe() for all dev_err() stuff in probe paths.
>>> It ends up cleaner and we don't care about the tiny overhead
>>> of checking for deferred.
>>
>> This one bothers me a bit. It just does not feel correct to pass -EINVAL for
>> the dev_err_probe() so the dev_err_probe() can check if -EINVAL !=
>> -EPROBE_DEFER. I do understand perfectly well the consistent use of
>> dev_err_probe() for all cases where we get an error-code from a function and
>> return it - but using dev_err_probe() when we hard-code the return value in
>> code calling the dev_err_probe() does not feel like "the right thing to do"
>> (tm).
>>
>> Eg, I agree that
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "bar");
>> is nice even if we know the function that gave us the "ret" never requests
>> defer (as that can change some day).
>>
>> However, I don't like issuing:
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "bar");
>
> This case specifically was added into documentation by 7065f92255bb ("driver
> core: Clarify that dev_err_probe() is OK even w/out -EPROBE_DEFER").
Yes. And this is exactly what I meant with:
>> Eg, I agree that
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "bar");
>> is nice even if we know the function that gave us the "ret" never
requests
>> defer
There is still (in my opinion) a significant difference if we call:
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "bar");
- where we really hard-code the -EINVAL as a parameter to the
dev_err_probe()
>> Well, please let me know if you think the dev_err_probe() should be used
>> even in cases where we hard code the return to something...
>
> And this should be, of course, maintainer's decision.
Ultimately, yes.
Best Regards
--Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 11:40 [RFC PATCH 0/5] iio: Support ROHM/Kionix kx022a Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] regulator: Add devm helpers for get and enable Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 11:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] " Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: Add KX022A accelerometer Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 19:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-21 19:30 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2022-09-21 19:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-22 3:49 ` Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iio: accel: Support Kionix/ROHM " Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 19:18 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2022-09-22 17:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-09-23 6:31 ` Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-24 15:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-09-26 5:02 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2022-10-02 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-09-28 11:14 ` Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-28 14:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-28 16:23 ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2022-10-02 11:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-10-02 11:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-10-02 14:31 ` Matti Vaittinen
2022-09-21 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3abc0a9-ad5b-f6ef-8cba-0b4c6c8325c0@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=Heikki.Haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=Mikko.Mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=demonsingur@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jagathjog1996@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).