From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D7C315D5D; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757099883; cv=none; b=CtOPi7MbobSsMIM7aUj/TRACHeA/Sj2qePpepF3aofeYUOJlz/SOIvUJiOSE5CJK6GUvynYn7t1nJoz6QIEdW90gp6LGvoHObssxhmwrbuDX1SMHWU4YUglfhAxRCTfmEk/+3G+2GNDXjfpOTW5A0ttl9YAAmzC1YTLDX9mm+ec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757099883; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7MRC0lZTayuh+KprYSHSa9qqkcqL8gzJBmURf1kGMUw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=MFOKvnkowudJPkwbT1MJJIJOlVNTVN/K9EJQUmE6MB1GEcOLMI0mD8YijLCascpgsv5txt9dvVzKsQ8dg9c1o9b8goGCHuXqe6fhv7C/5v6fLijmUU0vjE3lXo/ulDcKyMIgDWMmTHhfuJOdiCQbz01dMY6bzZPQTQZ43mJCxT8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=C5a+ffIS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="C5a+ffIS" Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cJR2F5sCJz9tDy; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 21:17:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1757099877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7AuHv2ylcVezR/vi7XrRIcEjiUPL9mtKb38cVL5qRBc=; b=C5a+ffISn5r4R4Dt1okCaUiNMJskcAYc3nK4MmwmbywC47MfKOnrHKcS2A67uCZ+pmMRgs /ACRnFdUb4YPqoPlfXB1RrDsrqqTzIjLawPCiQQ5+6nh+K8aGqgWBM9+LzQpDyNkSP5XMr dHXtih5o2apl/GwG2KKSIQC7eTS7M3ZoCnVWGz6fjDQPTUs7jD7cCgBGWyNuotpXs7YSrp rBSj7oSy5SI/HlJrN/FtTnR9Z0ENiUHaVD61/7mM5ODt5/42aHSmPVL0afDbFuVkZWDMvw FpWYvO2A6gsy7/NFFf90+Q0aiP5hqTxvmaVy8do912rACIGttpnEMploRUEGTQ== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 21:17:54 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: rpi-panel: Split 7" Raspberry Pi 720x1280 v2 binding To: Conor Dooley Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Conor Dooley , Dave Stevenson , Florian Fainelli , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20250904200036.168222-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20250905-humble-framing-3d9b786c87a2@spud> <3ba2de63-4282-4b1e-a576-0b4501e56a7b@mailbox.org> <20250905-imaginary-crazy-a5734cb794fc@spud> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <20250905-imaginary-crazy-a5734cb794fc@spud> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-ID: 40b1347b2509e434e1b X-MBO-RS-META: 4nawz5fb96azx54xwzyhdjacj1ddx7mw On 9/5/25 9:03 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 9/5/25 8:46 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>>> +examples: >>>> + - | >>>> + i2c { >>>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>>> + gpio@45 { >>> >>> ngl, seems strange to classify the device as a regulator in directory >>> and name, but use gpio as the node name in the example. >>> >>> Otherwise, this seems fine - if you feel that the hardware is >>> substantively differentially to what's in the "v1" regulator then >>> keeping them apart is valid. >>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley >> I can rename it to "mcu@" or "mfd@" some such ? I called it a regulator@ and sent a V2. I didn't include the AB, please give it a once-over and provide one if still applicable. Thanks !