From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76225221F39; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768568326; cv=none; b=QeNlZMQPK3RHq2fH4UUFpe0EJC0/FNk+hW6UXPUNS2KKsSeUrWFKj9clnW4vc00H0rIQJu87iua7ubsGkdLYuGo8FbcWEj6u2yG9tnROt6G4ssZdtbbnq06k/M6JUkYjoRzCKCn+Z9d9bqbXshBH1Vo5t/XLs3OggaGd/xojcH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768568326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cbNcEyT28INXVnED1KRjcBiYiJXlAbqna6yHQQ8z4cM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=iRWaiuiy9tXLSbbQAl86xkX/YJ71ClQK+Kp7IJqV1OX/071x+rs6duxR5EPclMQSLwVSb0U2445T8tV4sPFic4mZ/jQGZRt/ui7r6dbycrRLzEqfFS9RWYyRbFr4INwkjP8Bx0wc9hahVSHfGtnCNLBmF4+64rFevQIBBEGUfTA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H7JSTMfZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H7JSTMfZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6B5AC116C6; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:58:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768568326; bh=cbNcEyT28INXVnED1KRjcBiYiJXlAbqna6yHQQ8z4cM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=H7JSTMfZZR/csPl0OSjTTKJVdPVZ27279R16b+PzlyOgw3mYwlg6adOdi5Wsm9s5I kb0FlR6SHa9RnwEoXBG7GUQcGrk8c/UFE04r/IHdWjAXmmxJtLH64oo5Unol51/6Qu XTVPntKiHh0/BcEI28wR/f0O7RJv9alE8zga+BivF1qSUFICa9gb0mw5LrASKtnU0k aN3Zvay/+sZ+0pNwXhX86QsnukLDE7tjjM2jaD4/NN39aqvClg2fv57VeiDXKc94sa E89wIwtqUYFUGts6FTkQW3QIpZkiIGXlMdn2OVo3fkrPOvvFMzy9v64ZoLSEWt2xrQ Psrg2Hd6H8VxA== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:58:39 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] media: iris: Introduce vpu ops for vpu4 with necessary hooks To: Vikash Garodia , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dikshita Agarwal Cc: Abhinav Kumar , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dmitry Baryshkov , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vishnu Reddy , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Philipp Zabel References: <20251210-knp_video-v4-0-8d11d840358a@oss.qualcomm.com> <20251210-knp_video-v4-6-8d11d840358a@oss.qualcomm.com> <54b29b03-4166-60d9-d553-d0e655749da4@oss.qualcomm.com> <98481299-4db3-41f3-a974-d9d0075d92e0@kernel.org> <035e9f34-f28f-47fd-ac36-6277171b0e28@oss.qualcomm.com> From: Bryan O'Donoghue Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <035e9f34-f28f-47fd-ac36-6277171b0e28@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/01/2026 11:27, Vikash Garodia wrote: >> Thank you for reviewing this code. I would like to point that it took >> one month for Qualcomm to review this Qualcomm patch and in the same >> time Vikash is sending emails (more than one!) that Bryan does not >> review that fast as expected. > Firstly, the ask to Bryan have been to pull patches (not stressed on > review part), infact, even fixes are waiting for merge window while they > can easily go into RCs. This part of the process need some improvement. > > I have also appreciated him when he pulled long series for initial codec > enablement, i think you missed those part. > >> I do not find it acceptable approach to harass community reviewers that >> way. Even if you do it internally, not on the lists. lol >> I think this review timeline is final argument for Vikash to stop >> pushing such narratives and complains, because your review is expected >> to be BEFORE the maintainer upper in the upstream flow. > My understanding is that, if maintainer raise patches, then its more of > reviews from community and having RB tag from any of community member or > no open comments implies the series is good to go. > > This series is lying there for a month without any open comment, there > is nothing pending here to pull them. 2/6 patches in this series were marked in patchwork as having no RB so they weren't pulled. That's the whole story here. --- bod