From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
"Sylwester Nawrocki" <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Tomasz Figa" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: support a bus clock
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:29:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7d9993e-b51d-4348-aa1d-de0671062c57@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425-samsung-pinctrl-busclock-v1-2-898a200abe68@linaro.org>
On 25/04/2024 18:03, André Draszik wrote:
> On some Samsung-based SoCs there are separate bus clocks / gates each
> for each pinctrl instance. To be able to access each pinctrl instance's
> registers, this bus clock needs to be running, otherwise register
> access will hang. Google Tensor gs101 is one example for such an
> implementation.
>
> Update the driver to handle this optional bus clock:
> * handle an optional bus clock from DT
> * prepare it during driver probe
> * enclose all relevant register accesses with a clock enable & disable
>
...
> drvdata = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> pin_to_reg_bank(drvdata, pin, ®_base, &pin_offset, &bank);
> @@ -447,6 +456,12 @@ static int samsung_pinconf_rw(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
> width = type->fld_width[cfg_type];
> cfg_reg = type->reg_offset[cfg_type];
>
> + ret = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> mask = (1 << width) - 1;
> @@ -466,6 +481,8 @@ static int samsung_pinconf_rw(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -539,16 +556,24 @@ static void samsung_gpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> const struct samsung_pin_bank_type *type = bank->type;
> + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata = bank->drvdata;
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 data;
>
> reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset;
>
> + if (clk_enable(drvdata->pclk)) {
This is now called with bank->slock held, so you reversed the locking
thus creating possibility of ABBA deadlock.
Need to be moved to callers of samsung_gpio_set_value().
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> data = readl(reg + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_DAT]);
> data &= ~(1 << offset);
> if (value)
> data |= 1 << offset;
> writel(data, reg + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_DAT]);
> +
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> }
>
> /* gpiolib gpio_set callback function */
> @@ -569,12 +594,23 @@ static int samsung_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> u32 data;
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> const struct samsung_pin_bank_type *type = bank->type;
> + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata = bank->drvdata;
> + int ret;
>
> reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset;
>
> + ret = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> data = readl(reg + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_DAT]);
> data >>= offset;
> data &= 1;
> +
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> return data;
> }
>
> @@ -591,9 +627,12 @@ static int samsung_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank;
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 data, mask, shift;
> + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata;
> + int ret;
>
> bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> type = bank->type;
> + drvdata = bank->drvdata;
>
> reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset
> + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_FUNC];
> @@ -606,12 +645,20 @@ static int samsung_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> reg += 4;
> }
>
> + ret = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
Same problem.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> data = readl(reg);
> data &= ~(mask << shift);
> if (!input)
> data |= PIN_CON_FUNC_OUTPUT << shift;
> writel(data, reg);
>
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1164,6 +1211,12 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + drvdata->pclk = devm_clk_get_optional_prepared(dev, "pclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pclk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(drvdata->pclk);
> + goto err_put_banks;
> + }
> +
> ret = samsung_pinctrl_register(pdev, drvdata);
> if (ret)
> goto err_put_banks;
> @@ -1202,6 +1255,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused samsung_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int i;
>
> + i = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> + if (i) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev,
> + "failed to enable clock for saving state\n");
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_banks; i++) {
> struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = &drvdata->pin_banks[i];
> const void __iomem *reg = bank->pctl_base + bank->pctl_offset;
> @@ -1231,6 +1291,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused samsung_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> if (drvdata->suspend)
> drvdata->suspend(drvdata);
> if (drvdata->retention_ctrl && drvdata->retention_ctrl->enable)
> @@ -1252,6 +1314,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused samsung_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int i;
>
> + /* enable clock before the callback, as we don't want to have to deal
That's not netdev, so:
/*
*
> + * with callback cleanup on clock failures.
> + */
> + i = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
"i" is iterator, not return value. You want ret.
> + if (i) {
> + dev_err(drvdata->dev,
> + "failed to enable clock for restoring state\n");
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> if (drvdata->resume)
> drvdata->resume(drvdata);
>
> @@ -1286,6 +1358,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused samsung_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
> writel(bank->pm_save[type], reg + offs[type]);
> }
>
> + clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> if (drvdata->retention_ctrl && drvdata->retention_ctrl->disable)
> drvdata->retention_ctrl->disable(drvdata);
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 16:03 [PATCH 0/2] clock support for Samsung Exynos pin controller (Google Tensor gs101) André Draszik
2024-04-25 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: google,gs101-pinctrl needs a clock André Draszik
2024-04-25 18:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-25 18:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-26 10:54 ` André Draszik
2024-04-26 10:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-25 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: support a bus clock André Draszik
2024-04-25 18:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7d9993e-b51d-4348-aa1d-de0671062c57@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).