From: Wandun <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: kdump: exclude non-dumpable reserved memory regions from vmcore
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:04:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e812a821-8773-433a-818b-aa8321316ea6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520120203.20B7F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On 5/20/26 20:02, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Lockless traversal of `memblock.memory` combined with a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) pattern can cause an out-of-bounds array write if memory hotplug runs concurrently.
> --
>
> commit 9b53a1de1ee9b0da26c3c33056f291e1bba1171e
> Author: Wandun Chen <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
>
> arm64: kdump: exclude non-dumpable reserved memory regions from vmcore
>
> Reserved memory regions are excluded from vmcore by default unless marked
> dumpable. This patch honors the dumpable flag to filter out device firmware
> regions reserved via device tree to reduce vmcore size.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>> index e31fabed378a5..1d65320c6ba48 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ static int prepare_elf_headers(void **addr, unsigned long *sz)
>> nr_ranges = 2; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */
>> for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end)
>> nr_ranges++;
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lockless traversal of
> memblock.memory result in an out-of-bounds write if memory hotplug runs
> concurrently?
>
> The prepare_elf_headers() function iterates over memblock.memory twice:
> first here to count the regions for sizing the cmem allocation, and then
> later to populate cmem->ranges. This runs during the kexec_file_load
> syscall which holds kexec_mutex but not memory hotplug locks like
> device_hotplug_lock.
>
> If a memory hotplug operation (e.g., via sysfs) occurs between the two
> loops, memblock_add_node() could resize memblock.memory.regions via
> memblock_double_array(). This would free the old array and increase the
> region count.
>
> Could this cause the second loop to iterate over a freed array and write
> past the end of the allocated cmem->ranges array?
IIUC, this is a real race: prepare_elf_headers() scans memblock.memory
twice without holding any memory hotplug lock so a concurrent hotplug
could increase memblock.memory.regions between the two loops and cause
an out-of-bounds write to cmem->ranges, and also a potentially UAF on
the old regions array if memblock_double_array() fires.
However, this issue is independent of the current patch, I'd prefer to
address the memblock/hotplug race in a separate patchset after I look
into it more carefully.
>
>> + nr_ranges += of_reserved_mem_kdump_nr_ranges();
>>
>> cmem = kmalloc_flex(*cmem, ranges, nr_ranges);
>> if (!cmem)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/8] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] of: reserved_mem: handle NULL name in of_reserved_mem_lookup() Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] kexec/crash: provide crash_exclude_mem_range() stub when CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=n Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 9:53 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] of: reserved_mem: save /memreserve/ entries into the reserved_mem array Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 7:19 ` Wandun
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] of: reserved_mem: add kdump helpers to exclude non-dumpable regions Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 7:22 ` Wandun
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: kdump: exclude non-dumpable reserved memory regions from vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 8:04 ` Wandun [this message]
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] riscv: " Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 12:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] loongarch: " Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 13:10 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e812a821-8773-433a-818b-aa8321316ea6@gmail.com \
--to=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox