devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, sjg@chromium.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add device tree build information
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:39:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8cdbcaa-800b-18db-11ec-3d8df9da68b5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f09ce50c-6721-c9d3-4f27-3f98a2d0b183@gmail.com>

On 1/20/20 9:20 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 1/20/20 12:28 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi Frank!
>>
>> Thanks for the link back to the previous discussion, it's very
>> helpful.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:14:22AM -0600, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 1/20/20 4:56 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> and the date). There are no "dtb versions", and "absolute/relative"
>>>> path which created concerns. One remaining concern is "reproducible
>>>
>>> Here is an example of the info from one of my builds:
>>>
>>>   From Linux 5.5.0-rc2-dirty by frowand the Mon Jan 20 09:50:58 CST 2020.
>>>
>>> The information 'Linux 5.5.0-rc2-dirty' is precisely what was most objected
>>> to in my proposal.
>>
>> ACK. :-( I'm surprised to see so much push-back on what looks like a
>> simple piece of information here.
> 
> Me too.
> 
> 
>>
>> I've had users *specifically* asking for this kind of identification
>> so that they can verify the version of the DTB they're using at
>> runtime. Right now it can be a guessing game, which does not help
>> people trying to debug problems.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
> 
> If the information was reported as debug information via pr_debug(),
> would that work for your use case?  Or would the users' kernels
> not have debug enabled in the configuration?

And even pr_debug() might not be sufficient since the property
value is available via /proc/device-tree if the proc file
system is enabled.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-13 18:16 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add device tree build information Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-13 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] dtc: Add dtb build information option Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-16  0:57   ` David Gibson
2020-01-16  8:58     ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-17  9:09       ` David Gibson
2020-01-17 14:43         ` Rob Herring
2020-01-17 15:11           ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-19  6:40             ` David Gibson
2020-01-19  6:39           ` David Gibson
2020-01-21 15:59             ` Rob Herring
2020-01-21 17:18               ` Steve McIntyre
2020-01-23  5:13               ` David Gibson
2020-01-23 14:05                 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-20 18:17           ` Steve McIntyre
2020-01-22 18:00             ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-22 19:54               ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-13 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] of: fdt: print dtb build information Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-13 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] scripts: Use -B dtc option to generate " Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-17 19:20   ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-22 19:54     ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-20 16:16   ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-15 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add device tree " Steve McIntyre
2020-01-16  2:28 ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-16  8:19   ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-17 19:13     ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-20 10:56       ` Alexandre Torgue
2020-01-20 16:14         ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-20 18:28           ` Steve McIntyre
2020-01-21  3:20             ` Frank Rowand
2020-01-21  3:39               ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2020-01-21 17:10               ` Steve McIntyre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8cdbcaa-800b-18db-11ec-3d8df9da68b5@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=steve.mcintyre@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).