From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] firmware: ti_sci: Add support for Device control Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:30:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160819225159.10758-1-nm@ti.com> <20160819225159.10758-4-nm@ti.com> <9a6a8663-a3f7-7875-253f-98232d56b860@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nishanth Menon , Lokesh Vutla Cc: Russell King , Sudeep Holla , Santosh Shilimkar , Tero Kristo , Dave Gerlach , "linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , lkml , "Andrew F . Davis" , dt list , Russ Dill , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Nishant, On 8/23/2016 11:45 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> /** >>> + * tis_sci_is_response_ack() - Generic ACK/NACK message checkup >>> + * @r: pointer to response buffer >>> + * >>> + * Return: true if the response was an ACK, else returns false. >>> + */ >>> +static inline bool tis_sci_is_response_ack(void *r) >> >> May be just ti_sci_is_response_ack() to be consistent? or you wanted to >> keep it tis_sci* ? > > > Uggh.. Fat fingered that one.. thanks for catching.. fixed and will > post a v2 next week if there is no further comments > I would like to send the next merge window queue up so please repost the reviewed patches which needs to be queued up. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html