From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Yijie Yang <quic_yijiyang@quicinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: Enable RX programmable swap on qcs615
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebf3238c-12ec-4da7-bcdf-594bbe070a82@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89d4df79-a202-407a-bcfd-6af5315c403c@quicinc.com>
> > Maybe you should go read the RGMII standard, and then think about how
> > your hardware actually works.
> >
> > RGMII always has a variable clock, with different clock speeds for
> > 10/100/1G. So your board design is just plain normal, not
> > special. Does the standard talk about different delays for different
> > speeds? As you say, other drivers apply the same delay for all
> > speeds. Why should your hardware be special?
> >
> > RGMII has been around for 25 years. Do you really think your RGMII
> > implementation needs something special which no other implementation
> > has needed in the last 25 years?
>
> I do not intend to violate the regulations of the RGMII standard and aim to
> maintain the same delay across all speeds. But the RX programming swap bit
> can only introduce a delay of 180 degrees. Should I assume the 1G speed
> clock to calculate and determine if this bit should be enabled for all
> speeds?
Lets rewind a bit.
The RGMII standard specified which edge you sample on. Since it is
defined, no other driver has a configuration like this, they just
setup there hardware to be standards compliant.
Why do you need the ability to break the standard, and sample on the
wrong edge?
I can think of two reasons:
1) You have a PHY which is broken, it also samples on the wrong
edge. This is a workaround for that broken PHY.
2) You have a board with a clock line driver inserted between the
RGMII output pins and the PHY, and this line driver includes a NOT?
This line driver is causing the clocking to break the RGMII
standard. You are working around this broken board design by getting
the MAC to invert the clock.
Is there a third reason?
Lets first understand the details of why you need to be able to invert
the clock.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-21 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-25 10:04 [PATCH 0/3] Support tuning the RX sampling swap of the MAC Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: net: stmmac: Tune rx sampling occasion Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: Enable RX programmable swap on qcs615 Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 11:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-12-26 2:29 ` Yijie Yang
2024-12-26 17:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-08 9:42 ` Yijie Yang
2025-01-08 13:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-20 9:07 ` Yijie Yang
2025-01-20 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-21 7:13 ` Yijie Yang
2025-01-21 14:34 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2024-12-27 7:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-08 10:33 ` Yijie Yang
2025-01-13 11:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-14 1:51 ` Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 10:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615-ride: Enable RX programmable swap on qcs615-ride Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 17:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-12-26 1:23 ` Yijie Yang
2024-12-25 17:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] Support tuning the RX sampling swap of the MAC Andrew Lunn
2024-12-26 3:06 ` Yijie Yang
2024-12-26 17:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-08 10:43 ` Yijie Yang
2024-12-27 15:18 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebf3238c-12ec-4da7-bcdf-594bbe070a82@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_yijiyang@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).