Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: add support of generic PHY and ICE in Qualcomm chips

[ygardi@codeaurora.org]

thanks for inputs.
shortly I will upload a new version, where I address you comments

thanks,
Yaniv


>
> On Thursday 04 December 2014 09:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:59:58PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>>> In this change we add support to the generic PHY framework.
>>> Two UFS phys are implemented:
>>> qmp-20nm and qmp-28nm.
>>>
>>> Also, the files in this change implement the UFS HW (controller & PHY)
>>> specific behavior in Qualcomm chips.
>>> Relocation of a few header files is needed in order to expose routines
>>> and data structures between PHY driver and UFS driver.
>>>
>>> Also, this change include the implementation of Inline Crypto Engine
>>> (ICE)
>>> in Qualcomm chips.
>>
>> This whole patch is a mess.  It does way to many things in one patch,
>> and it doesn't explain enough of it.
>>
>> Please explain why you need it.  Especially as the PHY API is a generic
>> phy abstraction, so having to share defintions between the provider and
>> consumer seems wrong.  Even if you need some shared bits keep them to an
>> absolute minium insted of moving so much out of the driver directory.
>> Also if at all possible keep the shared data in a single header under
>> include/linux instead of having lots of global headers in a deep
>> directory structure.
>>
>> Second split this into patches that do a single things, and explain why
>> you're doing each:
>>
>>  1) header move if/as needed
>>  2) add 20nm phy driver
>>  3) add 28nm phy driver
>>  4) add ufs-qcom driver
>>  5) add ufs-qcom-ice support
>>
>> and so on.
>
> +1
>
> -Kishon
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>