From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: Of the device tree binary format endianness on little-endian platform Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:26:15 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1234975585.17001.131.camel@pc-laurentg.intra.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1234975585.17001.131.camel-AlTa8cHOufjkPJRI6LV1/EZjUo8kaGiB@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org To: Laurent Gregoire Cc: devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Laurent Gregoire wrote: > Hi, > > We are currently investigating the use of a flattened device-tree for > configuring some boot parameters on a new ARM platform. Laurent, I'm very interested in the work you are planning on doing. How are you planning on integrating device-tree support into the kernel? That is, are you going to be adding the code so that's local to your ARM platforms, or are you looking to make the device tree API available for all ARM? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale