From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:39:30 -0500
Message-ID: <ed82fe3e0905270739k38018c87ka11f62c5977e45fb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1243408083.13460.14.camel@debian-nb>
	 <fa686aa40905270727m31250984tf12249fc87179ce9@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1764333AbZE0Oji@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40905270727m31250984tf12249fc87179ce9@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

>> Signed-off-by: janboe <yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com>
>
> Heeheehe, This is Fantastic.

Yes, I agree.  Thanks for working on this.  I was hoping to work on it
myself later this year.  Freescale develops both ARM-based and
PowerPC-based SOCs, and some devices are shared between them (e.g. the
SSI).  Lack of device-tree support on ARM has been a real hindrance to
getting the ARM-based Linux support on par with PowerPC.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale