From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Kocialkowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: Add system-control node with SRAM C1 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:48:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20181205092444.29497-1-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> <20181205092444.29497-8-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> Reply-To: paul.kocialkowski-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-sunxi , Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 17:45 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 5:25 PM Paul Kocialkowski > wrote: > > Add the H5-specific system control node description to its device-tree > > with support for the SRAM C1 section, that will be used by the video > > codec node later on. > > > > The CPU-side SRAM address was obtained empirically while the size was > > taken from the documentation. They may not be entirely accurate. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > index b41dc1aab67d..42bfb560b367 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > @@ -94,6 +94,28 @@ > > }; > > > > soc { > > + system-control@1c00000 { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-system-control"; > > + reg = <0x01c00000 0x1000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges; > > + > > + sram_c1: sram@1d00000 { > > + compatible = "mmio-sram"; > > + reg = <0x00018000 0x1c000>; > > 0x1d00000 or 0x18000? For the H5, I found the VE SRAM area to be mapped to 0x18000 on the CPU side (when testing with devmem), unlike the A64, H3 and others. I was rather surprised about this as well! > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges = <0 0x00018000 0x1c000>; > > Same here. > > > + > > + ve_sram: sram-section@0 { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sram-c1", > > + "allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-c1"; > > + reg = <0x000000 0x1c000>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > mali: gpu@1e80000 { > > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mali", "arm,mali-450"; > > reg = <0x01e80000 0x30000>; > > -- > > 2.19.2 Cheers, Paul -- Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com