From: "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt-bindings: Fix incorrect statement
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:13:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee384af8-bdbe-db06-ce56-1c1f5bb7b49d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604194159.GA3781429@robh.at.kernel.org>
On 2021/6/5 3:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:57:20PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
>> It's found when reading the Doc.
> Please improve the subject so we have some clue as to what the change is
> and what it applies to.
>
Ok, I will improve the subject to make it more readable.
>> In a SMP system, the hierarchy of CPUs now can be defined through
>> four not three entities (socket/cluster/core/thread), so correct
>> the statement to avoid possible confusion.
>>
>> Since we are already there, also drop an extra space and tweak
>> the title alignment. No real context change at all.
> Since already here, converting to schema would be preferred over trivial
> fixes.
With pleasure to do this. I will send a v2 including this part of work.
Thanks,
Yanan
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt
>> index 9bd530a35d14..8b23a98c283c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt
>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ CPU topology binding description
>> 1 - Introduction
>> ===========================================
>>
>> -In a SMP system, the hierarchy of CPUs is defined through three entities that
>> +In a SMP system, the hierarchy of CPUs is defined through four entities that
>> are used to describe the layout of physical CPUs in the system:
>>
>> - socket
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ whose bindings are described in paragraph 3.
>>
>> The nodes describing the CPU topology (socket/cluster/core/thread) can
>> only be defined within the cpu-map node and every core/thread in the
>> -system must be defined within the topology. Any other configuration is
>> +system must be defined within the topology. Any other configuration is
>> invalid and therefore must be ignored.
>>
>> ===========================================
>> @@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ cpu-map child nodes which do not share a common parent node can have the same
>> name (ie same number N as other cpu-map child nodes at different device tree
>> levels) since name uniqueness will be guaranteed by the device tree hierarchy.
>>
>> -===========================================
>> +============================================
>> 3 - socket/cluster/core/thread node bindings
>> -===========================================
>> +============================================
>>
>> Bindings for socket/cluster/cpu/thread nodes are defined as follows:
>>
>> --
>> 2.19.1
> .
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 9:57 [PATCH] Documentation: dt-bindings: Fix incorrect statement Yanan Wang
2021-06-04 19:41 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-07 2:13 ` wangyanan (Y) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee384af8-bdbe-db06-ce56-1c1f5bb7b49d@huawei.com \
--to=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).