From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>, nuno.sa@analog.com
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] driver: core: allow modifying device_links flags
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:34:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef59aaa2a251e92d463d8983ab6eec459298c102.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8eae083af481441d83df02a1880e2aedf99efdfb.camel@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:14 +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 19:21 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:14 AM Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
> > <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > >
> > > If a device_link is previously created (eg: via
> > > fw_devlink_create_devlink()) before the supplier + consumer are both
> > > present and bound to their respective drivers, there's no way to set
> > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER anymore while one can still set
> > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER. Hence, rework the flags checks to allow
> > > for DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER in the same way
> > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER is done.
> >
> > Curious, why do you want to set DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER?
> > Especially if fw_devlink already created the link? You are effectively
> > trying to delete the link fw_devlink created if any of your devices
> > unbind.
> >
>
> Well, this is still useful in the modules case as the link will be relaxed
> after
> all devices are initialized and that will already clear AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER
> AFAIU. But, more importantly, if I'm not missing anything, in [1], fw_devlinks
> will be dropped after the consumer + supplier are bound which means I
> definitely
> want to create a link between my consumer and supplier.
>
Ok, so to add a bit more on this, there are two cases:
1) Both sup and con are modules and after boot up, the link is relaxed and thus
turned into a sync_state_only link. That means the link will be deleted anyways
and AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER is already cleared by the time we try to change the link.
2) The built-in case where the link is kept as created by fw_devlink and this
patch effectively clears AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER.
Given the above, not sure what's the best option. I can think of 4:
1) Drop this patch and leave things as they are. DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER is
pretty much ignored in my call but it will turn the link in a MANAGED one and
clear SYNC_STATE_ONLY. I could very well just pass 0 in the flags as
DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER is always ignored;
2) Rework this patch so we can still change an existing link to accept
DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER (in the modules case for example).
However, instead of clearing AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER, I would add some checks so if
flags have one of DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER or DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER and
AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER is already set, we ignore them. In fact, right now, I think
one could pass DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER and link->flags ends ups with
AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER | AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER which in theory is not allowed...
3) Keep it as-is... This one is likely a NACK as I'm getting the feeling that
clearing stuff that might have been created by fw_devlinks is probably a no-go.
Let me know your thoughts...
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 15:14 [PATCH v7 0/9] iio: add new backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] of: property: fix typo in io-channels Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-25 3:14 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-27 15:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-27 15:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-29 8:18 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-29 22:33 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-30 10:32 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-30 20:54 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-30 20:54 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31 8:55 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dt-bindings: adc: ad9467: add new io-backend property Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] dt-bindings: adc: axi-adc: update bindings for backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 16:36 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] driver: core: allow modifying device_links flags Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-25 3:21 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-25 8:14 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-25 15:34 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2024-01-25 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-01-26 8:04 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-26 14:26 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-27 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-29 8:29 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-29 22:31 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-30 10:54 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-26 0:57 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-26 8:05 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-26 0:50 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-26 8:13 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-26 14:27 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-26 18:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-01-27 8:43 ` Nuno Sá
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] of: property: add device link support for io-backends Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iio: buffer-dmaengine: export buffer alloc and free functions Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iio: add the IIO backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iio: adc: ad9467: convert to " Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-23 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: move " Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-01-27 15:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-28 21:27 ` David Lechner
2024-01-29 8:15 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef59aaa2a251e92d463d8983ab6eec459298c102.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).