devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:59:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efe6a7886c3491cc9c225a903efa2b1e.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131205405.GA2249327-robh@kernel.org>

Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-31 12:54:05)
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
> > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
> > Override 'initial_boot_params' to NULL when ACPI is in use but the
> > bootloader has loaded a DTB so that we don't allow both ACPI and DT to
> > be used during boot. If there isn't a valid initial_boot_params dtb then
> > unflatten_device_tree() returns early so this is fine.
> > 
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index 417a8a86b2db..ffb1942724ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -351,8 +351,11 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >       /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> >       acpi_boot_table_init();
> >  
> > -     if (acpi_disabled)
> > -             unflatten_device_tree();
> > +     /* Don't use the FDT from boot if ACPI is in use */
> > +     if (!acpi_disabled)
> > +             initial_boot_params = NULL;
> 
> I still think this is a problem for kexec. See 
> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(). You see it uses initial_boot_params. At 
> first glance it looks like it would just write out everything we need. 
> But for UEFI boot, I think we need all the chosen properties like 
> linux,uefi-mmap-start preserved from the current boot for the next 
> kernel we kexec.

Ok, got it.

> 
> I think you'll have to check acpi_disabled in unflatten_device_tree() 
> and unflatten the empty tree leaving initial_boot_params alone. That 
> means our FDT and unflattened tree will be different DTs, but I think 
> that's fine.

It's sort of scary given that 'initial_boot_params' is an exported
global. Maybe that should be hidden away and accessed with a function
instead so that this mismatch doesn't break something later on?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30  0:44 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: populate of_root node if bootloader doesn't Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-31 20:54   ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31 22:59     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-02-02 16:30       ` Rob Herring
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] um: " Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/of: Unconditionally call unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 13:30   ` Saurabh Singh Sengar
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: Always unflatten in unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: unittest: treat missing of_root as error instead of fixing up Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30  0:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: Add KUnit test to confirm DTB is loaded Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efe6a7886c3491cc9c225a903efa2b1e.sboyd@kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).