Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Redmi Note 8T

[barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org]

On 2026-01-16 10:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/16/26 7:53 AM, barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org wrote:
>> On 2026-01-13 10:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 1/12/26 9:13 PM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>>>> Redmi Note 8T (willow) is very similar to Redmi Note 8 (ginkgo)
>>>> the only difference is willow have NFC.
>>>> Make a common base from ginkgo devicetree for both device.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org>
>>>> ---
>>> 
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts 
>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> index 163ecdc7fd6c..70be19357d11 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
>>>> @@ -1,304 +1,12 @@
>>>>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>>>  /*
>>>> - * Copyright (c) 2025, Gabriel Gonzales <semfault@disroot.org>
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2026, Barnabas Czeman
>>> 
>>> Is there a reason for you to remove Gabriel's copyright from the 5 
>>> LoC
>>> that remain in this file?
>> The original file was renamed to sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo-common.dtsi.
>> I have not removed it, it is a new file with the old file name but
>> i can add Gabriel's copyright here also, would that be fine?
> 
> Well you certainly don't seem to have contributed anything additionally
> in this specific patch, other than splitting a source file into two
> source files, so the rule of the land is to generally keep the 
> copyrights
> as-is
I have kept the Copyright in the original file. The question is should I 
add it here also?
> 
> Konrad