Re: [PATCH 14/20] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali-mtp: Enable more features

[Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>]

On 10/10/25 13:54, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Hi Dmitry and Eugen,
> 
> On 10/9/2025 9:58 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 05:58:03PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/9/25 16:54, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>>>> Hi Eugen,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/25/2025 1:33 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/25/25 03:17, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Enable more features on Kaanapali MTP boards including PMIC peripherals,
>>>>>> bus, SDHCI, remoteprocs, USB, PCIE, WLAN and Bluetooth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Written with help from Jyothi Kumar Seerapu(added bus), Ronak Raheja
>>>>>> (added USB), Manish Pandey(added SDHCI), Jishnu Prakash(added PMIC),
>>>>>> Qiang Yu(added PCIE), Yijie Yang(Added WLAN) and Zijun Hu(Added Bluetooth).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali-mtp.dts | 663 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 663 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali-mtp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali-mtp.dts
>>>>>> index 9cf3158e2712..2949579481a9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali-mtp.dts
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali-mtp.dts
>>>>>> @@ -5,9 +5,23 @@
>>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&spmi_bus1 {
>>>>>> +	pmd8028: pmic@4 {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "qcom,pmd8028", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
>>>>>> +		reg = <0x4 SPMI_USID>;
>>>>>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		pmd8028_temp_alarm: temp-alarm@a00 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0xa00>;
>>>>>> +			interrupts = <0x4 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
>>>>>> +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		pmd8028_gpios: gpio@8800 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pmd8028-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0x8800>;
>>>>>> +			gpio-controller;
>>>>>> +			gpio-ranges = <&pmd8028_gpios 0 0 4>;
>>>>>> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> +			interrupt-controller;
>>>>>> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	pmih0108: pmic@7 {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "qcom,pmih0108", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
>>>>>> +		reg = <0x7 SPMI_USID>;
>>>>>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		pmih0108_temp_alarm: temp-alarm@a00 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0xa00>;
>>>>>> +			interrupts = <0x7 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
>>>>>> +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		pmih0108_gpios: gpio@8800 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pmih0108-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0x8800>;
>>>>>> +			gpio-controller;
>>>>>> +			gpio-ranges = <&pmih0108_gpios 0 0 18>;
>>>>>> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> +			interrupt-controller;
>>>>>> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		pmih0108_eusb2_repeater: phy@fd00 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0xfd00>;
>>>>>> +			#phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> +			vdd18-supply = <&vreg_l15b_1p8>;
>>>>>> +			vdd3-supply = <&vreg_l5b_3p1>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	pmr735d: pmic@a {
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The PMR735D is available in pmr735d_a.dtsi
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we find a way to reuse that include file instead of duplicating it
>>>>> here ?
>>>>
>>>> In pmr735d_a.dtsi, the peripherals are added under the parent phandle
>>>> "spmi_bus", which was commonly used in older SoCs having only a single
>>>> bus under the PMIC arbiter, but in Kaanapali, there are two buses
>>>> present under the PMIC arbiter, with phandles "spmi_bus0" and "spmi_bus1",
>>>> so we cannot include the file as it is.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I know the problem. I disagree with using include files in one case, and
>>> having the PMIC in the dts in the other case.
>>>
>>> So there has to be a unified way to handle this in all cases.
>>
>> Rework SPMI PMICs to follow the approach started by Johan for PM8008. I
>> think this is the way to go.
>>
> 
> We got a recommendation from Krzysztof recently here for Glymur: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/b784387b-5744-422e-92f5-3d575a24d01c@kernel.org/
> 
> For PMH0110, he suggested we could keep different DTSI files per SoC,
> like pmh0110-kaanapali.dtsi and pmh0110-glymur.dtsi.
> 
> We could follow a similar approach on Kaanapali, to 
> #include the following files in the .dts file:
> 
> pmk8850.dtsi
> pmh0101.dtsi
> pmh0110-kaanapali.dtsi
> pmh0104-kaanapali.dtsi
> pmd8028-kaanapali.dtsi
> pmih0108-kaanapali.dtsi
> pmr735d-kaanapali.dtsi
> pm8010-kaanapali.dtsi
> 
> The first two files are new and common with Glymur,so they
> do not have the SoC name suffix.
> 
> Hope this is fine, please let us know if you see any issue.

I would like it to be consistent, you would have to rename the old
pmr735d.dtsi into pmr735d-whatever-soc-was-using-it.dtsi in another
patch, and then create pmr735d-kaanpali.dtsi for kaanapali.

Does this look good ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jishnu
>