From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: "Mike Looijmans" <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>,
"Vesa Jääskeläinen" <dachaac@gmail.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: m.tretter@pengutronix.de, nava.manne@xilinx.com,
rajan.vaja@xilinx.com, manish.narani@xilinx.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree: zynqmp.dtsi: Add bootmode selection support
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:01:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2592ed7-9f1b-9a23-a6bd-ed8773a7873e@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85a5807e-1d66-867f-1d83-36e8a054a511@topic.nl>
On 20. 02. 20 7:56, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 19-02-2020 19:23, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 19.2.2020 14.20, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>>> Add bootmode override support for ZynqMP devices. Allows one to select
>>> a boot device by running "reboot qspi32" for example. Activate config
>>> item CONFIG_SYSCON_REBOOT_MODE to make this work.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> index 26d926eb1431..4c38d77ecbba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
>>> @@ -246,6 +246,30 @@
>>> };
>>> };
>>> + /* Clock and Reset control registers for LPD */
>>> + lpd_apb: apb@ff5e0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xff5e0000 0x0 0x400>;
>>> + reboot-mode {
>>> + compatible = "syscon-reboot-mode";
>>> + offset = <0x200>;
>>> + mask = <0xf100>;
>>> + /* Bit(8) is the "force user" bit */
>>> + mode-normal = <0x0000>;
>>> + mode-psjtag = <0x0100>;
>>> + mode-qspi24 = <0x1100>;
>>> + mode-qspi32 = <0x2100>;
>>> + mode-sd0 = <0x3100>;
>>> + mode-nand = <0x4100>;
>>> + mode-sd1 = <0x6100>;
>>> + mode-emmc = <0x6100>;
>>> + mode-usb0 = <0x7100>;
>>> + mode-pjtag0 = <0x8100>;
>>> + mode-pjtag1 = <0x9100>;
>>> + mode-sd1ls = <0xe100>;
>>
>> This kinda looks a bit misuse of reboot mode support.
>>
>> Usually you are signal with reboot-mode that you want to do factory
>> reset, enter recovery mode or such things.
>>
>> Now this signaling here is telling that this is used for selecting
>> from what device to boot from.
>
> On the ZynqMP this is the only way to communicate with the ROM.
>
>> Another problem is that this now modifies all Xilinx Zynq MPSoCs which
>> is kinda wrong. This behavior should really be product/board specific
>> and not common for all boards -- undoing this in product/board is
>> somewhat cumbersome.
>
> The boot mode setting is in the SOC, and is not board specific. The ROM
> interprets this field. The only board specific thing is that you may not
> actually have a NAND chip attached to it.
>
> My idea was that a board could easily add say 'mode-recovery=<0x2100>;'
> to make the QPSI boot the method of recovery. The bootloader also has
> access to this register, so it can see that there was a boot mode
> override in effect.
>
>> Now this change hijacks the "reboot <arg>" with this behavior which is
>> not so nice.
>
> If anyone has a better suggestion as to where this should go, I'd be
> more than happy to hear about it. It's the only interface that I could
> find in the kernel to attach a bootmode override to.
IIRC as the part of PSCI 1.1 spec is SYSTEM_RESET2 where you can device
reset_type. IIRC that 0 as warm reset was coming based on discussion
with Xilinx (and maybe others) and I think this is what Xilinx is still
using. But didn't track it if that was really implemented or not.
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 12:20 [PATCH] devicetree: zynqmp.dtsi: Add bootmode selection support Mike Looijmans
2020-02-19 18:23 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2020-02-20 6:49 ` Michal Simek
2020-02-20 6:56 ` Mike Looijmans
2020-02-20 7:01 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2020-02-20 8:01 ` Mike Looijmans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2592ed7-9f1b-9a23-a6bd-ed8773a7873e@xilinx.com \
--to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=dachaac@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.tretter@pengutronix.de \
--cc=manish.narani@xilinx.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=nava.manne@xilinx.com \
--cc=rajan.vaja@xilinx.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).