From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove useless mediatek,ufs-boost-crypt property
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3920433-b0fa-4a64-9653-e385bf1eb5c7@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93db93aa7eb24a255f97a1a1e8e8d936dc908258.camel@mediatek.com>
Il 16/04/24 12:31, Peter Wang (王信友) ha scritto:
>
>> Yes this causes -> less than half of a millisecond <- of additional
>> boot time
>> if the dvfsrc-supply is present but boost-microvolt is not.
>>
>> I really don't see the problem with that :-)
>>
>
> Adding a little bit of boot time to one smartphone might not be a
> problem, but when you consider a billion smartphones each adding a
> little bit, the cumulative effect becomes significant. The power
> consumption of these accumulated times will continue to increase,
> contributing to the Earth's carbon emissions. Moreover, removing the
> master switch for this feature doesn't seem to have any benefits other
> than not having to set it in the DTS. Similarly, the master switch for
> VA09 seems to have more disadvantage.
>
Sorry, but I still don't see how a few *microseconds* more of boot time can
be significant, even related to power consumption during boot.
If that was a few milliseconds, then I'd agree with you, but that's not the case.
Removing the master switch has a benefit: you *lose* a few microseconds of boot
time (so, boots in *few microseconds LESS*) on platforms that would have this set
in devicetree, as this property is redundant with the other activation checks
for those features.
So, there you go: if the majority of MediaTek platforms are already using this
crypt boost feature, then this commit reduces carbon emissions, as those would
boot in a few less microseconds.
Regards,
Angelo
>
>> Regards,
>> Angelo
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ret = ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl(hba);
>>>> if (ret)
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 11:00 [PATCH v4 0/8] MediaTek UFS fixes and cleanups - Part 1 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove useless mediatek,ufs-support-va09 property AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Fix property name for crypt boost voltage AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove useless mediatek,ufs-boost-crypt property AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-16 7:03 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-04-16 7:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-16 10:31 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-04-16 10:38 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2024-04-16 13:05 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-04-17 8:14 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-17 9:29 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-04-17 9:34 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Avoid underscores in crypt clock names AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Document MT8192 compatible with MT8183 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 13:00 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Document MT8195 compatible AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Document additional clocks AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-04-15 13:00 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-15 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Document optional dvfsrc/va09 regulators AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3920433-b0fa-4a64-9653-e385bf1eb5c7@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).