From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Brian Masney" <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>,
"Sudeep Holla" <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
"Cristian Marussi" <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@kernel.org>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulfh@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"Kuninori Morimoto" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
"Clément Le Goffic" <clegoffic@baylibre.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] reset: Extract __reset_control_get_from_provider()
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:55:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3e365f5440cbd005df45410a89032dcf685258e.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2824c50f77aa287a3555533e4b9760109aae1741.1788338320.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>
On Mi, 2026-09-02 at 13:29 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Extract the code to create a reset_control structure from a given
> provider into its own function, so it can be reused later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> v3:
> - New.
> ---
> drivers/reset/core.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 38e189d04d09b270..8af7cd2e8a5029df 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -1135,6 +1135,54 @@ __reset_find_rcdev(const struct fwnode_reference_args *args, bool gpio_fallback)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static struct reset_control *
> +__reset_control_get_from_provider(const struct fwnode_reference_args *args,
> + struct fwnode_handle *consumer, int index,
> + bool gpio_fallback,
> + enum reset_control_flags flags)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *rstc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
> + int rstc_id = -EINVAL;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
> +
> + rcdev = __reset_find_rcdev(args, gpio_fallback);
> + if (!rcdev)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(args->nargs != rcdev->fwnode_reset_n_cells))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + if (rcdev->of_xlate && is_of_node(consumer)) {
> + struct device_node *np = to_of_node(consumer);
> + struct of_phandle_args of_args;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np,
> + gpio_fallback ? "reset-gpios" : "resets",
> + gpio_fallback ? "#gpio-cells" : "#reset-cells",
> + gpio_fallback ? 0 : index,
> + &of_args);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + rstc_id = rcdev->of_xlate(rcdev, &of_args);
> + of_node_put(of_args.np);
> + } else if (rcdev->fwnode_xlate) {
> + rstc_id = rcdev->fwnode_xlate(rcdev, args);
> + }
> + if (rstc_id < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(rstc_id);
> +
> + flags &= ~RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_OPTIONAL;
This should stay in __fwnode_reset_control_get().
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &rcdev->lock)
> + rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev, rstc_id, flags);
> +
> + return rstc;
Just return __reset_control_get_internal(...) directly, the rstc local
variable is not needed.
> +}
> +
> struct reset_control *
> __fwnode_reset_control_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id, int index,
> enum reset_control_flags flags)
> @@ -1142,10 +1190,7 @@ __fwnode_reset_control_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id, int ind
> bool optional = flags & RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_OPTIONAL;
> bool gpio_fallback = false;
> struct reset_control *rstc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
> struct fwnode_reference_args args;
> - struct of_phandle_args of_args;
> - int rstc_id = -EINVAL;
> int ret;
>
> if (!fwnode)
> @@ -1185,46 +1230,9 @@ __fwnode_reset_control_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id, int ind
> }
> }
>
> - guard(mutex)(&reset_list_mutex);
> -
> - rcdev = __reset_find_rcdev(&args, gpio_fallback);
> - if (!rcdev) {
> - rstc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> - goto out_put;
> - }
> -
> - if (WARN_ON(args.nargs != rcdev->fwnode_reset_n_cells)) {
> - rstc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - goto out_put;
> - }
> -
> - if (rcdev->of_xlate && is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(to_of_node(fwnode),
> - gpio_fallback ? "reset-gpios" : "resets",
> - gpio_fallback ? "#gpio-cells" : "#reset-cells",
> - gpio_fallback ? 0 : index,
Hmm, I think this gpio_fallback disambiguation is not needed. In the
gpio_fallback case (lookup via "reset-gpios") we should always get a
reset_gpio rcdev with fwnode_xlate, not of_xlate.
Not an issue for this refactor, though.
> - &of_args);
> - if (ret) {
> - rstc = ERR_PTR(ret);
> - goto out_put;
> - }
> -
> - rstc_id = rcdev->of_xlate(rcdev, &of_args);
> - of_node_put(of_args.np);
> - } else if (rcdev->fwnode_xlate) {
> - rstc_id = rcdev->fwnode_xlate(rcdev, &args);
> - }
> - if (rstc_id < 0) {
> - rstc = ERR_PTR(rstc_id);
> - goto out_put;
> - }
> -
> - flags &= ~RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_OPTIONAL;
Keep this here.
> -
> - scoped_guard(mutex, &rcdev->lock)
> - rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev, rstc_id, flags);
> + rstc = __reset_control_get_from_provider(&args, fwnode, index,
> + gpio_fallback, flags);
>
> -out_put:
> fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
>
> return rstc;
With that,
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 11:29 [PATCH v3 00/12] R-Car X5H Ironhide CPG/MDLC SCMI remapping support Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] dt-bindings: clock: renesas,r8a78000-cpg: Add renesas,scmi-firmware property Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-04 14:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-04 14:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] dt-bindings: power: renesas,r8a78000-mdlc: Add firmware property Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-04 14:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add scmi_get_base_info() Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for renesas,scmi-firmware Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] pmdomain: Make genpd_get_from_provider() public Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] reset: Extract __reset_control_get_from_provider() Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-03 8:55 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] reset: Add reset_control_get_from_provider_exclusive() Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-03 10:03 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] clk: renesas: r8a78000: Add clk_hw to clk_map Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] clk: renesas: r8a78000: Add SCMI remapping support Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] pmdomain: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] arm64: dts: renesas: ironhide: Enable SCMI devpd, sys, clock, and reset Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] arm64: dts: renesas: ironhide: Add CPG/MDLC renesas,scmi-firmware properties Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-09-02 11:40 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3e365f5440cbd005df45410a89032dcf685258e.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bmasney+clk@redhat.com \
--cc=clegoffic@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox