From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] can: dev: Add support for limiting configured bitrate Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:43:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170719233654.25908-1-fcooper@ti.com> <20170719233654.25908-2-fcooper@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170719233654.25908-2-fcooper@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Franklin S Cooper Jr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com, dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be, andrew@lunn.ch List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Franklin, On 07/20/2017 01:36 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +void of_transceiver_is_fixed(struct net_device *dev) > +{ (..) > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_transceiver_is_fixed); > +#endif I'm not sure about the naming here. As this is a CAN transceiver related option it should be named accordingly: E.g. can_transceiver_is_fixed of_can_transceiver_is_fixed ... Especially as it is defined in include/linux/can/dev.h Regards, Oliver