From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB4B12FF8E; Wed, 1 May 2024 15:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714578227; cv=none; b=nAXp5gt+KlHUTOXy00nLml/J13ccPnJjdjZUw/rKxWMIfO3yHiB4Jm7MrNQ93c9XWn37bViELOUpZCZyytdo0MXRb7IVfW7CKNdr8ZYjRZx3jsUvV9XrDx0/h6DUb5RsLYylJVitEghuLFRJ9z7gSkzhsDb17WBHspFpYg9wO4k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714578227; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+j1MhO27oq6Z2k/UMaKrknwIvc97IqQ6TsLfVDaEsVA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qyqHUn9/qS8y2+Uy3jGPXY7m39VXKdc5UARjtyhMiDpzOr4jLMLC52AG6JiStD/kdGgErik428W3Jnn7MhiReOiH+zlYHXPtm2XFQTrWz0K4XkXWwam/w+b1kbercJtTYrPDLTFdJXFeAVXoPMkyQFwUPdSgKRi+ARM10yfrxbE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=JA9s74oB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JA9s74oB" Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6eb93ec8804so3900805a34.2; Wed, 01 May 2024 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714578225; x=1715183025; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WYyt1RBKP+5wqyIqwmy5cnYZMq9VEpLdANc4tFv/eOc=; b=JA9s74oBcNhi3U2CLmWURFd2W5GdVotI852dwp5wy4qkLb9GyiWPWdpugf7kz7MW6E uKZWDIiY0JEnRDSOqLvnNbiKOVGX9Cay0hMMkXh6CCX1JSkpSBvvXppcQMyUvVnAgt27 1At1IHqX60vNNwkGVfooe7HYdNu06bt0lKLKpxXhk0JsuAYDnshjylmagbYVcYr063kh Eu0u4Lgl7kSgj5vpE+460LrdweO8fEAhZObQ8YQf82nENILEgeorKAKkBb+oe/sCSWic i+yebGfIl0n05zCGgeH3lWtlqq1dmKJUHc5/Z+6NZFS5asC9A9AtlAoTGuzxL1H4NDg0 3dHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714578225; x=1715183025; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WYyt1RBKP+5wqyIqwmy5cnYZMq9VEpLdANc4tFv/eOc=; b=M4KFwDFTu3QR1CL34FJwpH9nEk0kFOh3OdR2ET/unwrX7l0QXyXhLRQuLg+DcSrAkD N5cNSFttCQa+8G6c/5CLMUkPZNbnT4ifHjfh73BJRBpYyO3KBaqp+b7Ze5hzkupiLvUx r88IuXJ1OjMkLPW2ucz0peWrpnHYLnYLOZpRUqXj/LHg1amn6RGoVkImCQUSWovOXAhT HFSjYuabt9el7zl+u5FSTae1m2tGWsGvyl1xiSCVQqqbs3ryFwmfGYEgUUaaeLNTF4aW 9Woyc+A5eVLSnnPSynau7AWGkAbbnVluqf0MY9EaVQ3iCXof9Q+fZUIHeVcf2dHuz3Oq B4Rg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXZc/zJJK20mf4MAOolUl5RGUabcWO/oQ81cA7hQILnu0xzRammqSu71FsJCElrLt6nih/h0FVtdrl+ZjbElCF/w84Hw2efCN5kbMBWZ9uphC1bKzZhquaEsWmgQ2PLxfwIEGBPjvwJxlvppwhKwQwEIEeDUdiMKZDYrO7KGgto79QXfDvCHfqdrxQ3njUpvZz8sDGLSVY40R5D4EnIl3vi9+8gQr/7H7Vjsxh8ZCOWpR5YKUQBOSX2wxh2uck= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBxuSGh2DEyXATfYyi8wVS9hwPlWTl3Qzi644LVcoTx96tiHZh 2NHrzS4tIIvIC/idCnjUAoAfgGp4zvUBDpdkbP3m8rJDbvzCNHw2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEVAUBi8gaQAQaPiF+BdK+POH9BTZIvS3fio856v721oE2NZNnhywEs1M2R3KrsTS8RWdtRpg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1284:b0:6ef:a0a4:b601 with SMTP id z4-20020a056830128400b006efa0a4b601mr1830971otp.36.1714578225542; Wed, 01 May 2024 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.7.169] (c-98-197-58-203.hsd1.tx.comcast.net. [98.197.58.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fc12-20020a056830498c00b006ee0d82d41dsm1595872otb.71.2024.05.01.08.43.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 May 2024 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 10:43:43 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 5/8] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Lorenzo Pieralisi , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org References: <20240501042847.1545145-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20240501042847.1545145-6-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: mr.nuke.me@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/1/24 5:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/05/2024 06:28, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: >> IPQ9574 has four PCIe controllers: two single-lane Gen3, and two >> dual-lane Gen3. The controllers are identical from a software >> perspective, with the differences appearing in the PHYs. >> >> Add a compatible for the PCIe on IPQ9574. > > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when > provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 > can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add > the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the > version they apply. > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. I had an Acked-by tag from Rob for what is now patch 6/8 -- previously 5/7. Due to last-minute info from QUIC Inc, Dmitry and I decided to move the "snoc" and "anoc" clocks out of the PHY and to the PCIe controller. This change resulted in a 6/8 patch that is substantially different from what Rob acked. I felt it was inappropriate to keep the tag. Alex