From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E852C433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1386342AbiDUIEQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 04:04:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55060 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344890AbiDUIEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 04:04:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C610326F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id b24so5427547edu.10 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:01:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MjMj7j2b58g3Fs2GDoRx9AQenU1ytemGpXtMCrxETUc=; b=NYdGQxPPwnRdIBVwF7pPrMR6GN1BDIcM0wDpBYNTF+2n4Gad4PqA8rEEzED/xk+1eZ 0lK1WjBy/qAX+TXrQ9FmP/n605QPm6LIUb/UsG8afL/FClUWaRvec/X4CyIxCtEKTgYO dYYgoG+shjdDoy+zLXCAY2BZDZgZ33JGo0aady4rulQeCfiBwZsbBsyRYAchXtrns/A1 RA6WiEvyzMX4/E4z8oOLj8yKedcICvBAatoOyNtI+4sm1ax121UKcpFFPVP9OrPbIoga kMpy0my6M1Wg/f9Oczhtb6NdZS69ufzTgEP7bKH2SOdQNZxyNKmHtJxZ9PY1NoFfznf7 UOOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MjMj7j2b58g3Fs2GDoRx9AQenU1ytemGpXtMCrxETUc=; b=5ZIiTxMzrtiuZAA2QUiNVFaBPxiDjoNUXhs8GmwXfxCc2ctfk9IDoaS99yU6UEQEs3 kNr3twFhRHiOXP59MZJi811TgEiRsc4WEg32kyuw4aJnnNFOnuAY0b5ag/90dDymkERe 0JnfFcDs+vYrrcZAwldLxjxzc9Kdxrgi27OCtjcqukUIVuDoHgYpJyrgNwlOYZcWq3ik kaCIGkRNe4OdDdx/rxtU5OGoyh+o+EdB9zhbZAlxbGuyYEMbEZRROndvPf1lg5TcciD1 gw42DGk1XTfNsni3R5I0qcWrVGsHcSgLK3fXvKdfY3SNebK81yBIiChRljvLrnOfKQQT 44CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KavZXrqcCuMIxZXH4ptcr/ZZRkOpRsLr4iSAYbKQaXqPMJFxD X82C/z43PuLSInlqZzHhF2oxGvwN4LUs6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyarBv6DNgivhvvzolW+CQw8vVO1R8UHNq38QMh0dgBHplqLk+dS95uG2+e9Egg0If3tYFQzA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2547:b0:423:f342:e0e3 with SMTP id l7-20020a056402254700b00423f342e0e3mr17476265edb.371.1650528084407; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.226] (xdsl-188-155-176-92.adslplus.ch. [188.155.176.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10-20020aa7de8a000000b004215209b077sm10565025edv.37.2022.04.21.01.01.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:01:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8183-kukui: align SPI NOR node name with dtschema Content-Language: en-US To: Matthias Brugger , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20220407142143.293740-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <165044570803.75184.17759035800452933385.b4-ty@linaro.org> <38f29c29-e3c2-240a-23a0-509c4febf1ca@gmail.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <38f29c29-e3c2-240a-23a0-509c4febf1ca@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 20/04/2022 14:35, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 20/04/2022 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:21:43 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> The node names should be generic and SPI NOR dtschema expects "flash". >>> >>> >> >> Looks like no one wants to take this, so let me take care of it. >> > > First thing would have been a ping on the patch, don't you think? And what does it change? The operating-points clean up [1] was sent in August last year, then in this April, and you responded only when I wrote pick-up. The Google cros-ec clean up was sent in Feb and two weeks later pinged [2]. Pinging and resending apparently does not help. It's okay, happens, we are all extra busy and we all pretty often do it as part of community/hobby/spare time. > Anyway as I > said the last time, if you take DTS patches for mediatek I don't want to take the patches for Mediatek. But I also don't want to resend and ping each one of them because it did not work in the past. > , I'd need a stable > branch I can merge so that we don't have any merge conflicts in the end. Can you just pick the patch? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22arm64%3A+dts%3A+mediatek%3A+align+operating-points+table+name+with+dtschema%22 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22arm64%3A+dts%3A+mt8183%3A+align+Google+CROS+EC+PWM+node+name+with+dtschema%22 Best regards, Krzysztof