Re: [Patch v3 1/3] media: dt-bindings: s5p-mfc: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC.

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 11/11/2022 04:23, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> Since,MFC v7 support was added for Exynos5420 and Exynos
> 3250 SoC with same compatible string "samsung,mfc-v7".As
> both SoCs having different hardware properties and having
> same compatible string for both SoCs doesn't seems to be correct.
> New compatible is added for Exynos3250 SOC which will
> differentiate the node properties for both SoCs which
> support MFC v7.

Subject: Drop full stop from subject.

Commit: This is not correct formatting, nor wrapping. In English after
every comma  or full stop there is a space.
Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586

Not "is added" but just "Add new compatible"
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95

But what is more important:

> 
> Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@samsung.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> We are already in process of converting this txt file to yaml.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20221011122516.32135-2-aakarsh.jain@samsung.com/
> Modifying this txt binding for completeness.
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> index aa54c8159d9f..cb166654fa81 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> @@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ Required properties:
>    - compatible : value should be either one among the following
>  	(a) "samsung,mfc-v5" for MFC v5 present in Exynos4 SoCs
>  	(b) "samsung,mfc-v6" for MFC v6 present in Exynos5 SoCs
> -	(c) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC
> -	(d) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
> -	(e) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
> -	(f) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC
> +	(c) "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for MFC v7 present in Exynos3250 SoC
> +	(d) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC
> +	(e) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
> +	(f) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
> +	(g) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC

I don't see here any improvements about which I commented since v1.

Best regards,
Krzysztof