From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:11:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f999ddef22580427dcb0205a9f7ba97f227c56a3.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <348b0d94-4b3a-454d-be67-47563808ec76@baylibre.com>
On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 11:29 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 10/15/25 5:30 AM, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 17:02 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > Add support for SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE to the AXI SPI engine driver.
> > >
>
> ...
>
> > > +
> > > + if (xfer->rx_buf || xfer->offload_flags &
> > > SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_RX_STREAM ||
> > > + xfer->tx_buf || xfer->offload_flags &
> > > SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_TX_STREAM) {
> >
> > I'm a bit confused by this condition. It looks like setting priv-
> > >multi_bus_mode
> > (and the other fields) only matters for msg->offload but the above will be
> > true
> > for regular rx/tx messages, right? Or am i missing something?
>
> You are correct.
>
> >
> > If so, I wonder why doing this for all transfers if we only care about
> > multi_bus_mode for offload messages. I guess you want to validate
> > xfer->multi_bus_mode?
>
> Yes, this is important to validate it since we don't support all possible
> modes.
> The mode still applies to the individual xfer even when not using SPI
> offloading.
>
> > I would then just take the switch() out of the condition
> > (I mean trying to setup a no data xfer with an invalid bus_mode should also
> > be
> > seen as invalid IMO) and then use the offload conditions (or maybe simply
> > msg-
> > > offload?) for the multi_bus_mode handling. To me, it makes the intent more
> > clear.
>
> It the validation only matters for xfers that send or receive data. I guess
> it doesn't hurt to check the mode in non-data xfers (e.g. ones with just a
> delay)
> but since we needed the condition anyway for the accumulator, it made sense to
> me to put it inside the conditional.
Sure, but note that I did said that I would tread xfers that do not send/receive
data and have an invalid mode as an error (the flag should not be there anyways)
and that's why I was suggesting taking the validation out of the condition. No
strong feelings though so fine to keep it this way.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 22:02 [PATCH 0/6] spi: add multi-bus support David Lechner
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add spi-buses property David Lechner
2025-10-21 14:21 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-21 14:59 ` David Lechner
2025-10-30 13:51 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-30 22:42 ` David Lechner
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] spi: Support multi-bus controllers David Lechner
2025-10-15 10:06 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 20:16 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] spi: add multi_bus_mode field to struct spi_transfer David Lechner
2025-10-15 10:16 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-15 14:43 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-15 16:15 ` David Lechner
2025-10-15 16:43 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 18:38 ` David Lechner
2025-10-16 9:08 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-16 15:25 ` David Lechner
2025-10-17 12:36 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 20:21 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE David Lechner
2025-10-15 10:30 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 12:03 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-15 16:29 ` David Lechner
2025-10-16 9:11 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-10-15 20:53 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-10-15 22:01 ` David Lechner
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7380: add spi-buses property David Lechner
2025-10-14 22:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] iio: adc: ad7380: Add support for multiple SPI buses David Lechner
2025-10-15 10:36 ` Nuno Sá
2025-10-15 18:46 ` David Lechner
2025-10-18 18:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f999ddef22580427dcb0205a9f7ba97f227c56a3.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).