devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 15:50:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9b942a2-073d-5f28-81d1-63be02829fef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550311ad-8f93-3e80-9706-1321482b8c19@gmail.com>

Hi All,

The email for Ivan is no longer valid.  Can anyone else help me with
my question?

Thanks,

Frank


On 08/31/18 15:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> 
> On 02/03/15 04:17, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter configuration nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> index 1f130bc..dbedf64 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> @@ -226,5 +226,21 @@
>>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>>  			status = "disabled";
>>  		};
>> +
>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> +			reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> +			reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> +			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
>> +			interrupts = <0 190 0>;> +			qcom,ee = <0>;
>> +			qcom,channel = <0>;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> +		};
>>  	};
>>  };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> index e265ec1..2d11641 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -247,5 +247,21 @@
>>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>>  		};
>> +
>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> +			reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> +			reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> +			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
> 
>> +			interrupts = <0 190 0>;
> 
> The final value in this interrupts property means IRQ_TYPE_NONE.
> 
> A WARN_ON() was added early this year to complain about use of
> IRQ_TYPE_NONE: 83a86fbb5b56 "irqchip/gic: Loudly complain about
> the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE", resulting in many warnings spewing
> forth when I boot an APQ8074 Dragonboard.  I am trying to
> determine whether the warning is overly aggressive, or whether
> the IRQ TYPE is incorrectly specified for the spmi node.
> 
> The interrupt-parent for the spmi node is intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000,
> which has compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2".  I do not know the architecture
> or implementation of this interrupt controller.  Is an IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> valid in this case, or should a specific type be provided?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Frank
> 
> 
>> +			qcom,ee = <0>;
>> +			qcom,channel = <0>;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> +		};
>>  	};
>>  };
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 12:17 [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add 8x74 chipset SPMI PMIC's nodes Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add APQ8084 " Ivan T. Ivanov
     [not found] ` <1422965880-11047-1-git-send-email-iivanov-NEYub+7Iv8PQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-03 12:17   ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974 Ivan T. Ivanov
2018-08-31 22:46     ` Frank Rowand
2018-08-31 22:50       ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-08-31 23:01       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-01  0:05         ` Frank Rowand
2015-02-03 20:38   ` [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices Bjorn Andersson
2015-02-10  7:17     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-10 21:58 ` Andy Gross
2015-02-20  0:49 ` Stephen Boyd
     [not found]   ` <54E6848C.1090405-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-26 16:25     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-03-03  8:19       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-04 10:31         ` Ivan T. Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9b942a2-073d-5f28-81d1-63be02829fef@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).