From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
To: "Jérôme de Bretagne" <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/surface: aggregator_registry: Add Surface Pro 9 5G
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:29:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9cbd1c3-eb05-4262-bdc6-6d37e83179e5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240908223505.21011-4-jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
Looks good. Two very small nit-picks below, if this goes for a v3:
On 9/9/24 12:35 AM, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
> Add SAM client device nodes for the Surface Pro 9 5G, with the usual
> battery/AC and HID nodes for keyboard and touchpad support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c
> index 25c8aa2131d6..8b34d7e465c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,21 @@ static const struct software_node *ssam_node_group_sp9[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
> +/* Devices for Surface Pro 9 5G. */
Would be nice if you could change the comment on the SP9 node group to
"Surface Pro 9 (Intel/x86)" and the comment here to "Surface Pro 9 5G
(ARM/QCOM)" or something along those lines to make things a bit more
clear.
> +static const struct software_node *ssam_node_group_sp9_5G[] = {
(This is really just me being a bit obsessive:) It would be nice to have
all-lowercase variable names (regarding the 5G).
> + &ssam_node_root,
> + &ssam_node_hub_kip,
> + &ssam_node_bat_ac,
> + &ssam_node_bat_main,
> + &ssam_node_tmp_sensors,
> + &ssam_node_hid_kip_keyboard,
> + &ssam_node_hid_kip_penstash,
> + &ssam_node_hid_kip_touchpad,
> + &ssam_node_hid_kip_fwupd,
> + &ssam_node_hid_sam_sensors,
> + &ssam_node_kip_tablet_switch,
> + NULL,
> +};
>
> /* -- SSAM platform/meta-hub driver. ---------------------------------------- */
>
> @@ -462,6 +477,8 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id ssam_platform_hub_acpi_match[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ssam_platform_hub_acpi_match);
>
> static const struct of_device_id ssam_platform_hub_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> + /* Surface Pro 9 5G */
> + { .compatible = "microsoft,arcata", (void *)ssam_node_group_sp9_5G },
> /* Surface Laptop 7 */
> { .compatible = "microsoft,romulus13", (void *)ssam_node_group_sl7 },
> { .compatible = "microsoft,romulus15", (void *)ssam_node_group_sl7 },
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
On a related note: I'm wondering whether we should also already add the
ACPI IDs for the as-of-now ARM-only devices. Technically, things won't
work with ACPI right now, but it's not because of the SAM driver stack.
Or maybe at least add them to the comments as a way of documenting it.
Best regards,
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-08 22:35 [PATCH v2 0/5] Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G support Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] firmware: qcom: scm: Allow QSEECOM on " Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-09-10 21:10 ` Maximilian Luz
2024-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/surface: aggregator_registry: Add " Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-09-10 21:29 ` Maximilian Luz [this message]
2024-10-07 18:44 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-10-07 18:53 ` Hans de Goede
2024-10-07 19:59 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-10-22 8:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-10-23 17:25 ` Maximilian Luz
2024-10-23 21:10 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-10-24 7:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add uart18 Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-10-10 8:52 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-10 21:17 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2024-10-11 6:36 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-07 14:25 ` (subset) [PATCH v2 0/5] Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G support Bjorn Andersson
2024-10-07 14:42 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9cbd1c3-eb05-4262-bdc6-6d37e83179e5@gmail.com \
--to=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jerome.debretagne@gmail.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).