Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] memory: Add Broadcom STB memory controller driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 12/08/2022 20:29, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 8/9/22 02:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/08/2022 01:09, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Add support for configuring the Self Refresh Power Down (SRPD)
>>> inactivity timeout on Broadcom STB chips. This is used to conserve power
>>> when the DRAM activity is reduced.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> +static int __maybe_unused brcmstb_memc_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct brcmstb_memc *memc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	if (memc->timeout_cycles == 0)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	return brcmstb_memc_srpd_config(memc, memc->timeout_cycles);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_memc_pm_ops, brcmstb_memc_suspend,
>>> +			 brcmstb_memc_resume);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver brcmstb_memc_driver = {
>>> +	.probe = brcmstb_memc_probe,
>>> +	.remove = brcmstb_memc_remove,
>>> +	.driver = {
>>> +		.name		= "brcmstb_memc",
>>> +		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>>
>> No need, run coccinelle.
>>
>>> +		.of_match_table	= brcmstb_memc_of_match,
>>> +		.pm		= &brcmstb_memc_pm_ops,
>>
>> Shouldn't this be pm_ptr()? and then no need for __maybe_unused in
>> brcmstb_memc_resume/suspend.
> 
> How can one can remove __maybe_unused without causing a warning for the 
> CONFIG_PM=n case, not that I needed to build to convince myself, but 
> still did anyway:
> 
> drivers/memory/brcmstb_memc.c:275:12: warning: 'brcmstb_memc_resume' 
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   static int brcmstb_memc_resume(struct device *dev)
>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/brcmstb_memc.c:252:12: warning: 'brcmstb_memc_suspend' 
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   static int brcmstb_memc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> unless you also implied enclosing those functions under an #if 
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) or something which is IMHO less preferable.

Are you sure you added also pm_ptr()? I don't see such warnings with W=1
and final object does not have the functions (for a different driver but
same principle).

Best regards,
Krzysztof