From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree. Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:05:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1217967220-30557-1-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> <1217967220-30557-2-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: John Rigby Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Oops, forgot to add devicetree-discuss to the cc: list g. On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:13 PM, John Rigby wrote: >> So get_immrbase can function without a device_type = "soc" >> property in the soc node. >> >> The "soc" node should really be named "immr" >> because it does not include the entire soc, however >> u-boot currently looks up this node by name for >> a clock fixup so leave it "soc" for now. We will change >> it later after 5121 u-boot uses the immr alias instead >> of the node name. > > Is it not sufficient to search the tree for a node with the > -immr compatible value? I don't think this is the intended use > case of aliases. > > g. > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.