From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support. Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:33:20 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20080821.001012.265401427.davem@davemloft.net> <20080821163256.GC15669@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20080821.142134.127315039.davem@davemloft.net> <48ADDF86.2040200@freescale.com> <9e4733910808211645p27ff2c6ci6dba6f363e9ece15@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9e4733910808211645p27ff2c6ci6dba6f363e9ece15@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Smirl Cc: Scott Wood , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, David Miller List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 8/21/08, Grant Likely wrote: >> Ugh, more like loads of pain. There are deployed platforms using the >> embedded 'invented' bindings. I don't think it is an option to break >> compatibility with older trees. If there is some backwards >> compatibility code then I'm all for migrating to the same binding as >> Sparc and PowerMac > > Has anything really been deployed? These bindings are only a few months old. It was over a year ago when support for i2c devices in the device tree was merged. See commit id d13ae8620dfdedfa7e9ab6d1eec294adc0516065. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.