From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: Device tree binding documentation Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:27:06 -0600 Message-ID: References: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA3047E572F@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <490744B1.2000602@genesi-usa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <490744B1.2000602-sEEEE4iEDtaXzmuOJsdVMQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org To: Matt Sealey Cc: devicetree-discuss list , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Hugh Blemings , Anton Vorontsov List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Matt Sealey wrote: > > > Yoder Stuart wrote: >> >> So my vote is to maintain bindings as plain text files. > > Just like the real elections I don't actually have a vote here, If that were true you wouldn't have been in the 'to:' list. > but can I put my oar in that after a certain review process and > time has passed and the binding stabilizes, these get published > as PDF documents similar to an AppNote or the ePAPR specification > so that you get the advantages of bookmarks, pagination, > formatting (notes, examples and warnings) and printing it in a > reasonable fashion on a dead tree as if it were a book? I think that is reasonable if it is something people find useful or more accessible. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.