From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: Device tree configuration for I2C eeprom Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:29:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <16691A8B34B5D9458EA3A1C37A11555A0137F7B6@tanisys-ex2.Tanisys.Local> <20080918221335.GA6420@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <9e4733910809181521r3cd74119tfedd36567e3b5394@mail.gmail.com> <20080919050441.GD25528@secretlab.ca> <20080919071238.GA8773@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Sebastian Siewior Cc: Ayman El-Khashab , devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Sebastian Siewior > wrote: >> * Grant Likely | 2008-09-18 22:04:41 [-0700]: >> >>>No, don't use the generic chip names. Device tree convention is to be >>>specific and prefix the part number with the vendor name. ie. You should >>>be using "at,at24c64", not "24c64". >> >> What about the i2c drivers which don't have any prefix like the m41t80? >> Prior commit 0d1cde2 aka "powerpc/i2c: Convert i2c-mpc into an >> of_platform driver" the ids were converted. > > That is the *driver* not the device tree description. The OF i2c code > is still converts the name. By default it does this by simply > stripping off the manufacturer prefix, but the match table does still > exist when the default behavior needs to be overridden. Oops, I already replied to this one. Sorry for the duplicate response. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.