From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] of: add of_parse_phandle() helper for parsing Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:01:02 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org To: sunder ramani Cc: linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss list , afleming-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:37 PM, sunder ramani wrote: > To Summarize, should not we have a phy_type flag in the OF tree which > will let the PHY layer do the various PHY tasks based on if it is a > copper/fiber interface. I really dont like my fix in my kernel and am > new to open source. Do you think it is a valid argument? If it so, I > would like to plan to introduce those changes and post to the > community. Yes, we probably do need some form of flag here for describing the PHY interface. Feel free to post a suggested binding for this. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.