From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] arm: use generic infrastructure for early params Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:01:20 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1261479296.245235.191110925832.0.gpush@pororo> <20100106162731.GB1728@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201001070931.00811.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> <201003060733.57636.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201003060733.57636.rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Rob Landley Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Jeremy Kerr List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 16:31:00 Jeremy Kerr wrote: >> Russell, >> >> > This is something which should be separate from the rest of the DT >> > patch - could we have this as a patch which can be applied to the >> > current kernel tree please? >> >> Sure, patch coming. >> >> The first three patches of this series (prefixed with arm:, rather than >> arm- dt:) are all generic arm patches that don't specifically add device >> tree support, would you like the other two as well? >> >> I'm in the process of rebasing my work onto a merge or your and Grant >> Likely's test-devicetree branch, so future patches should be easier to work >> with. >> >> Cheers, > > What's the current status on the device tree for arm stuff? > > I'm going through some of my todo bookmarks and stumbled across > http://lwn.net/Articles/367752/ and I'd like to poke at it under qemu. > > I've been patching the kernel kconfig stuff to let me plug various different arm > processors into a versatile board (because it's convinced that you can't > possibly have an armv6l versatilepb and qemu's -cpu option makes that easy). > Feeding in a device tree (or better yet teaching qemu to generate one) sounds > like a better long-term approach... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ARMDeviceTrees g.