From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/microblaze fixes for 2.6.34-rc2 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:35:36 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4B98F32D.8020906@monstr.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B98F32D.8020906-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org Cc: devicetree-discuss , Linus Torvalds , LKML , John Williams List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Please pull Microblaze changes to your tree. There is support for PCI and > new DMA interface. > > Thanks, > Michal Hi Michal. I'm really unimpressed that you've merged the cloned PCI support code when we talked about merging the common powerpc & microblaze bits /before/ pushing it up to mainline. At the very least I would have expected a reply back from you telling me that you disagree and that you wanted to merge anyway. I didn't even get a reply back form you when I asked about why the PCI bits were in your linux-next branch. Now it needs to be merged in-place which is a lot more work. g.