From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:56:38 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1269380552-10418-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <4BAB816F.5060405@firmworks.com> <4BAB9120.1060600@freescale.com> <4BACD011.5050609@freescale.com> <4BACFF7B.3010002@freescale.com> <4BAD018B.6010309@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BAD018B.6010309-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: Scott Wood , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > >> Nah. =A0That looks totally fine. =A0Not having the firmware under a qe >> node would look bad to me. > > You don't think it weird to have one QE node reference data from another = QE node, or that the DTS implies that the firmware belongs to one QE more t= han it belongs to the other? Nope. g.