From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, rob.herring@linaro.org
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, grant.likely@linaro.org,
olof@lixom.net, nm@ti.com, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com, mike.turquette@linaro.org,
kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
ta.omasab@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de,
broonie@kernel.org, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:16:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcb800ff92057c0bc83c1ce66255d818ba34e1e2.1423642246.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1423642246.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1423642246.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Later commits would add support for new OPP bindings and this would be required
then. So, lets do it in a separate patch to make it reviewing easy.
Another change worth noticing is INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opp->node). We weren't doing it
earlier as we never tried to delete a list node before it is added to list. But
this wouldn't be the case anymore. We might try to delete a node (just to reuse
the same code paths), without it being getting added to the list.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 9e2118284f02..904dcf386747 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
* _opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from a table definition
* @dev_opp: points back to the device_opp struct this opp belongs to
* @opp: pointer to the OPP to remove
+ * @notify: OPP_EVENT_REMOVE notification should be sent or not
*
* This function removes an opp definition from the opp list.
*
@@ -441,13 +442,14 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
* strategy.
*/
static void _opp_remove(struct device_opp *dev_opp,
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp, bool notify)
{
/*
* Notify the changes in the availability of the operable
* frequency/voltage list.
*/
- srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp);
+ if (notify)
+ srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp);
list_del_rcu(&opp->node);
call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &opp->rcu_head, _kfree_opp_rcu);
@@ -497,7 +499,7 @@ void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq)
goto unlock;
}
- _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp);
+ _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp, true);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
}
@@ -533,6 +535,63 @@ static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev)
return dev_opp;
}
+static struct dev_pm_opp *_allocate_opp(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_opp **dev_opp)
+{
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+
+ /* allocate new OPP node */
+ opp = kzalloc(sizeof(*opp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!opp)
+ return NULL;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opp->node);
+
+ /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */
+ *dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(*dev_opp)) {
+ *dev_opp = _add_device_opp(dev);
+ if (!*dev_opp) {
+ kfree(opp);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return opp;
+}
+
+static int _opp_add(struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp, struct device_opp *dev_opp)
+{
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp = NULL;
+ struct list_head *head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
+
+ /*
+ * Insert new OPP in order of increasing frequency
+ * and discard if already present
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
+ if (new_opp->rate <= opp->rate)
+ break;
+
+ head = &opp->node;
+ }
+
+ /* Duplicate OPPs ? */
+ if (opp && new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
+ dev_warn(dev_opp->dev,
+ "%s: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d. New: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d\n",
+ __func__, opp->rate, opp->u_volt, opp->available,
+ new_opp->rate, new_opp->u_volt, new_opp->available);
+ return opp->available && new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt ?
+ 0 : -EEXIST;
+ }
+
+ new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
+ list_add_rcu(&new_opp->node, head);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* _opp_add_dynamic() - Allocate a dynamic OPP.
* @dev: device for which we do this operation
@@ -563,66 +622,29 @@ static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev)
static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
long u_volt, bool dynamic)
{
- struct device_opp *dev_opp = NULL;
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *new_opp;
- struct list_head *head;
+ struct device_opp *dev_opp;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
int ret;
- /* allocate new OPP node */
- new_opp = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_opp), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!new_opp) {
- dev_warn(dev, "%s: Unable to create new OPP node\n", __func__);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
/* Hold our list modification lock here */
mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
+ new_opp = _allocate_opp(dev, &dev_opp);
+ if (!new_opp) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
/* populate the opp table */
new_opp->rate = freq;
new_opp->u_volt = u_volt;
new_opp->available = true;
new_opp->dynamic = dynamic;
- /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */
- dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
- if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
- dev_opp = _add_device_opp(dev);
- if (!dev_opp) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto free_opp;
- }
-
- head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
- goto list_add;
- }
-
- /*
- * Insert new OPP in order of increasing frequency
- * and discard if already present
- */
- head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
- if (new_opp->rate <= opp->rate)
- break;
- else
- head = &opp->node;
- }
-
- /* Duplicate OPPs ? */
- if (new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
- ret = opp->available && new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt ?
- 0 : -EEXIST;
-
- dev_warn(dev, "%s: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d. New: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d\n",
- __func__, opp->rate, opp->u_volt, opp->available,
- new_opp->rate, new_opp->u_volt, new_opp->available);
+ ret = _opp_add(new_opp, dev_opp);
+ if (ret)
goto free_opp;
- }
-list_add:
- new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
- list_add_rcu(&new_opp->node, head);
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
/*
@@ -633,8 +655,9 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
return 0;
free_opp:
+ _opp_remove(dev_opp, new_opp, false);
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
- kfree(new_opp);
return ret;
}
@@ -922,7 +945,7 @@ void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev)
/* Free static OPPs */
list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
if (!opp->dynamic)
- _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp);
+ _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp, true);
}
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
--
2.3.0.rc0.44.ga94655d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 8:16 [PATCH 0/7] OPP: Introduce OPP bindings V2 and supporting code Viresh Kumar
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Viresh Kumar
2015-02-23 22:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-02-24 4:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-24 17:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-02-25 3:45 ` viresh kumar
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar
2015-02-11 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] opp: Parse new (v2) bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU opps Viresh Kumar
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] cpufreq-dt: Use DT to set policy->cpus/related_cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-02-12 0:52 ` [PATCH 0/7] OPP: Introduce OPP bindings V2 and supporting code Stephen Boyd
2015-02-12 7:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-12 8:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-17 7:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-22 18:56 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <cover.1423642246.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-11 8:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] opp: convert device_opp->dev to a list of devices Viresh Kumar
2015-02-27 5:25 ` [PATCH 0/7] OPP: Introduce OPP bindings V2 and supporting code Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAKohpokF0_or8aXwzWZ=bUX1Robk8THyqRpKjbaarg9NHufLmw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-16 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-01 6:22 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAKohpokDhHo1ftcB6b4b+hO125_sqjK0NKESt79GVcWEwiq04w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-01 16:43 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLCjkrb2gT-_hj-UTAs+qn2LZtEm=f_C05ovhdwkZKB-A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-02 3:00 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcb800ff92057c0bc83c1ce66255d818ba34e1e2.1423642246.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).